Pranav Chaturvedi (PC) - Poet/Blogger/Email: poet@jpranavc.com / jpranavc@gmail.com - Copyright (c) Material
There’s a saying, the wave thinks it to be unalike,
That sees World distinct, diverse evolves for thee;
Yet, when you see from above, no matter how high,
Every consecutive same, yet, saying, different me!
And who stands on the shore too, sees big or small,
I'm the First (Human) Poet in the World, who has written in the last fifteen years or more, hundreds of poetries on Robots, AI, and the reasonable necessity for the induction of Species Another in the World in the Poetic Form. And despite of this FACT, still, Search Engines would either won’t display my portals and details on the First page, as being demonstrated by me in my earlier blog, or, such would be indexed on the last page, when searched with my name. Further, despite of the fact that I ne’er violated any provision of BERNE w.r.t anyone’s IP.
No idea what Works in the WORLD these days, BUT, looking at how the Internet has been degraded in the last couple of Decades; I’m sure that I’m NOT standing on the wrong side of the: History in Making! And I would always reiterate this equation that:
PR + Recommendations == TRASH!😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024
The superficial implants on the bodies,
Doesn’t mean now known is its biology;
IF, can’t evolve anything at cellular level,
Or synapses that transmits philosophies.
Scene 4: Coffee Shop
After the rise of AfD, Mr. Scholz is listening to Psychedelic Trance, whilst sipping Flat White Coffee. Aunt EU enters and joins him.
Aunt EU: ‘One incident, and you commenced the deporting?’
Mr. Scholz: ‘Didn’t you also see, Starmer’s Immigration rulings?’
Aunt EU: ‘He’s no more my son; but indeed, he came and met!’
Mr. Scholz: ‘I ain’t alone! Look at how Macron with Left, dealt!’
Aunt EU: ‘It is a difficult time you know, carefully we must navigate,’
Mr. Scholz: ‘AfD, FDP, SDP, PTSD; no idea how we reached to this!’
Imagine! The AGI, now the Natural Person!
And a Natural Person, Not the DNA Edited;
As, no altering History, mere for Inclusivity!
And who’s is past in books also (d)(cr)e(d)bited.
I still remember, when Mr. Bolsonaro got defeated, the liberal media jumped in joy, some even indirectly & unnecessarily called: fall of fascism! (YAWN)! But to their surprise, Mr. Lula didn’t take a second to condemn the policies of West. A setback to the mainstream, who seems to be addicted calling everyone fascist, in the name of Inclusivity!
Now, may be I'm wrong,
and indeed need some illumination on this, Yet:
Nobel always cite the WILL of Late Mr. Alfred Nobel; and it seems, one sentence that makes the terms both impossible condition & contradictory, and that seems to have been also modified by the executors as well, without being explicitly mentioned and signed by the testator w.r.t. modification; and that is, to execute the WILL: during the ‘preceding’ year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind…..for….Important Discovery OR Invention in: Physics, Chemical, Physiology/Medicine, Literature (outstanding work in Idealistic direction), Abolition reduction of standing armies/establishment and promotion of peace congresses/advance fellowship among the nations.
Heard about the WILL of NOBEL, as the same be conferred to those “who have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind!”
Take this hypothetical example w.r.t. Inventions: Let’s say the person who invented Telescope, witnessed the exponential rise of it, on a larger scale; and at no point there’s anyone stating that we must un-invent Telescope, or its foundation wasn’t beneficial! Now, this should be considered as the ‘greatest benefit to mankind’, a gift whose foundation so far has not been questioned, and it has witnessed the exponential rise in its making!
Recently, I came across to a video wherein an IITian proudly stating that, they’re the first preference for visa across World, and started mentioning the countries they’re living in. Issue was, this gentleman was narrating this in front of academicians, and received an applause for the same too. The problem with this statement is: He basically equated himself and others to mere a user commodity, alike oil & avocados; and not the originator of the products that being used for export; YET, somehow, audience gave this gentleman a resounding applause. I can give this grad who seems to be a juvenile for me, w.r.t. life experiences a benefit of doubt; but what about others? Because, haven’t you heard the places which export(ed) labourers from their lands, and what they were/are being called or considered as in the history books?
Furthermore, please remember that every recession, turmoil, discord, too originated VIA a person from any Ivy League only; doesn’t matter whether that Ivy League belongs to West or EAST!