Should You Change History For Inclusivity?

 

Imagine! The AGI, now the Natural Person!

And a Natural Person, Not the DNA Edited;

As, no altering History, mere for Inclusivity!

And who’s is past in books also (d)(cr)e(d)bited.

Why Mr. Musk Committed A Mistake In Brazil!

 

I still remember, when Mr. Bolsonaro got defeated, the liberal media jumped in joy, some even indirectly & unnecessarily called: fall of fascism! (YAWN)! But to their surprise, Mr. Lula didn’t take a second to condemn the policies of West. A setback to the mainstream, who seems to be addicted calling everyone fascist, in the name of Inclusivity!

The WILL

 

Now, may be I'm wrong, and indeed need some illumination on this, Yet:

Nobel always cite the WILL of Late Mr. Alfred Nobel; and it seems, one sentence that makes the terms both impossible condition & contradictory, and that seems to have been also modified by the executors as well, without being explicitly mentioned and signed by the testator w.r.t. modification; and that is, to execute the WILL: during the ‘preceding’ year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind…..for….Important Discovery OR Invention in:  Physics, Chemical, Physiology/Medicine, Literature (outstanding work in Idealistic direction), Abolition reduction of standing armies/establishment and promotion of peace congresses/advance fellowship among the nations.

What Defines ‘Greatest Benefit To Mankind?’

 

Heard about the WILL of NOBEL, as the same be conferred to those “who have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind!”

Take this hypothetical example w.r.t. Inventions: Let’s say the person who invented Telescope, witnessed the exponential rise of it, on a larger scale; and at no point there’s anyone stating that we must un-invent Telescope, or its foundation wasn’t beneficial! Now, this should be considered as the ‘greatest benefit to mankind’, a gift whose foundation so far has not been questioned, and it has witnessed the exponential rise in its making!

Ivy Leagues’ / IITs etc., Please Grow Up!

 

Recently, I came across to a video wherein an IITian proudly stating that, they’re the first preference for visa across World, and started mentioning the countries they’re living in. Issue was, this gentleman was narrating this in front of academicians, and received an applause for the same too. The problem with this statement is: He basically equated himself and others to mere a user commodity, alike oil & avocados; and not the originator of the products that being used for export; YET, somehow, audience gave this gentleman a resounding applause. I can give this grad who seems to be a juvenile for me, w.r.t. life experiences a benefit of doubt; but what about others? Because, haven’t you heard the places which export(ed) labourers from their lands, and what they were/are being called or considered as in the history books?  

Furthermore, please remember that every recession, turmoil, discord, too originated VIA a person from any Ivy League only; doesn’t matter whether that Ivy League belongs to West or EAST!

Conversation b/w Mr. Trump & Ms. Harris! (Unreal)

 

Scene 3: Coffee Shop

Ms. Harris is sipping on Americano (Black). Mr. Trump orders Frappuccino, and joins Her.

Mr. Trump: ‘I defeated 1st ‘H’; I’ll defeat another ‘H’; I can defeat Triple ‘H’!’,

Ms. Harris: ‘Merely with support of Mr. RFK Jr, Thiel, Musk, in A(J)’d’vance?’;

Mr. Trump: ‘Didn’t you hear originally; what AOC, Newsom, & Sanders said?’

Ms. Harris: ‘But the Obamas’, Clintons’, Silicon Valley; forged my Chance!’

Not A Single Person In The World EVER Understood What (E)(I)mmigration Actually Meant!

 

I was casually watching Time Bandits series (2024) on Apple TV; albeit, this is made for Kids, to make them understand about the history of the World, on a very lighter note; Yet, in the end, a choice is being given to the child (Kevin), as to whom should he give the Universe Map (via which anyone can travel anywhere). Whether to Supreme Being, or, to the Evil? Dilemma in it is: Supreme Being (God) is in a process of bringing Mass Extinction to the World to Create Earth 2.0 (A well thought proposition, a fresh start); Whereas, his Antagonist (Evil) offers Not to destroy the World in its entirety, BUT, to bring more Misery and make the World more Miserable.

This was a good Dilemma! And Kevin thinks, if God is going to destroy everything, then there won’t be any memories left also; thus, he decides to give the Map to the Evil; albeit there was a twist in the end!

NOW:

How Is The Revolution In B’Desh Going On?

 

What option Sri-Lanka had post revolution? Noting! Besides, now being at the alms of IMF, then and now! This is what Critics Laundering Program achieve at the end of the day. The laundered Critics makes money, multiply, live a posh life! Whilst the rest, end up being clowns! B’Desh chose the same. Now, it has 3 options against it:

1.     Join China, in which case, eventually, it might, have to collaborate with PAK again, due to former’s close relations with it; against which they fought Independence five decades back, and sacrificed. DÉJÀ VU;

2.     Allow NATO to build its base, in which case, it would make China its direct Enemy, and becoming another Ukraine of South Asia;

3.     Befriend India; in which case, Mrs. Shiekh Hasina might return to B’Desh, and once again participate in the Elections, and the chances are that, she might again Win! So, what was the Revolution all about?

Conversation b/w Mr. Modi & Mr. Xi! (Unreal)

 

Scene 2: Coffee Shop

Mr. Xi is Sipping Mocha Grande. Mr. Modi Enters & Joins him.

Mr. Xi: ‘Look NaMo! If it’s about any J.V.; then Science has no Motherland; but, Scientists do!’

Mr. Modi: ‘I ain’t here for any J.V.. Tell me, departing from Populated Market, who guided You?’

Mr. Xi: ‘In the beginning, there maybe a deal to split Capitalism-Communism; World into Two!’

Mr. Modi: ‘So that cheap labour would originate from East in name of equality, & sail through?’

Mr. Xi: ‘Then maybe, maybe, stepped beyond the territories that was being assigned, to rule,’

Mr. Modi: ‘Indeed! In name of Debt-Trap Diplomacy, Expansionism; going back to old school?'