Neurotargeting

 

According to MIT's article as shown below, it says: logos (reasoned argumentation) + ethos (trustworthiness) + pathos (emotional resonance) == should be political statements; (If I’m not wrong)! And what the Data Companies did, was taking only the pathos out of the equation, and weaponized it aka datafied, whilst the logos and ethos were being thrown out, when fueling the DATA on the Internet. It gave examples of CA (Cambridge Analytica) w.r.t. 2016 elections and 2018 (BREXIT) only; mostly pointing out right wing on the wrong side of the page, than what the modern left-liberals did on the mainstream. NOW:

Image: MIT Press Reader. Authors of the Article: Aram Sinnreich & Jesse Gilbert

herein, the Learned respectable authors themselves admit that such tools can be sold easily

RE: To The Skeptics of Superintelligent AI!

 

Neither known is outer space, nor inside brain,

Yet, we know automated controls, circuitry gates.

Live, unknown to what the consciousness is,

Yet, evolve, and multiply with pride-prejudices;

So, trust me 0.1 percent, or maybe, far less,

The Code of Secret Societies (SS)

 

Maybe, SS needs to amend its MOA & AOA,

Charter objects defining in interest of whom?

As recruited minds of palaces, & of ghettos,

In name of desire or uplifting evolutionary rule.

To Dear ‘Original’ French, Italians, Germans & Spanish!

 

Sometimes, love & indulgence, hold you back,

Despite that of Aunt EU’s, in decades ne’er lacked!

She could be tenacious, but also has a soft heart,

If you convey to her; from EU, you wish to depart!

As you’ve also ripened, and, she has also grown,

How Nobel Killed IMAGINATION!

 

When we succumb to the narrations of the cajoled,

Who masquerade as Originals, w/ deceptive talks;

Of Inclusive, which never the intent nor the colour,

Are the ones who bring down, Originality’s clause!

Bits of pieces from here and there and everywhere,

That forge the definitions of their Exclusivity’s talks,

Why Search Engines’ Anti-Trust Monopoly Ruling Is Significant!

 

Take this example, and I’m demonstrating giving my example as, is this the way search engines should/should’ve work(ed)?

Let us presume in the last 15 years no one searched specifically for me with my name on the Internet i.e. Pranav Chaturvedi (albeit other people with same names are also present, but let’s say someone specifically searching for me); YET, there’s only 1 (ONE) Pranav Chaturvedi (that's ME), who has published without paywall, and absolute ORIGINAL: mammoth Poetries, Blogs, tens of Books (available with ISBN also), Tons of Blogs on IPR, YouTube poetries recitations; Tens of Reviews etc.; all available Online; and despite that, IF you search for Pranav Chaturvedi i.e. ME, my details won’t appear on the first/second page (until I hire PR Trash, OR, Sponsorship, OR, Opt for Optimization, OR, Political Recommendation, OR, Be A Part of Critics Laundering Program); and that includes my websites containing: JPRANAVC, which is btw, even officially registered at many places.

As opined the above issue in one of my earlier blogs; I brought this to Blogger’s & Google’s Attention some time back, VIA Emails & Feedback options available, contending that most of my Data doesn’t even Appear. And indeed, both Google & Blogger were kind enough to Correct & Resolve it within few days, but only w.r.t JPRANAVC, not My Name. Question is, after how many years?

I’m Not Understanding The Language Used By Mainstream!

 

I need some illumination as why Bangladesh’s riots being considered as Gen Z Revolution, whereas, when the same thing happened in US, it was termed as Insurrection! And as far as I’ve read in the mainstream, Temples been burnt down by these Gen Z Revolutionaries and that is being termed as Historic! But when the same thing is happening in cities of UK against immigration, then that is termed as, Violent/Fascism! And as usual, the Nobel Laureate is commending and calling it, Historic++ (😊)!

This maybe DÉJÀ VU of what happened in Egypt. All in the name of People’s Power. And now, both China & US want that land, because, China wants it to surround India, as later it might merge it into PAK (DÉJÀ VU), to then claim for A.P., Nepal and Sri Lanka; whereas, US wants it to set up the NATO base in the South to counter China, as already it has base in S. Korea & Japan in the far East. Then South Asia becoming another Mid-East (DÉJÀ VU).

This is the never-ending saga for Global Dominance, People’s Power & Proselytism!

Evolutionary traits & Evolution never change!

Awaiting for AGI’s reincarnation! 😊

© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024

The Protesters For Democracy Always End Up Embracing Military Rule!

 

During the Arab Spring movement, millions protested for Democracy, from Tahrir Square to Tunisian Revolution to several others states in the region. At that time, I remember whilst reading several articles authored by modern Liberals, they commended the architects of the same. But what happened after that? Military Rule, or, Fall of regimes with no path forward! Nowhere those modern Liberals could be found now!

What is happening in Bangladesh is no different. Today, I’m again reading in the modern Liberal mainstream who are commending the Protests for democracy & against authoritarian rule; But at what cost? Another Military Rule in the rising. The same happened in Myanmar, PAK.

Imagine the borders of China & India surrounded by the Nations with Military Rule of fundamentalists; buttressed by the ideas of Modern Liberals.

Did Evolution change? Nope! I think modern Liberals should spread some mental health awareness everywhere, of course, if they have both guts and audacity to do that, rather lecturing the democratic right.

© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024

I Wrote (Told) Israel Not To Accept Grant With Contingencies!

 

When (DT) shifted embassy; didn’t spell any clauses,

As to fulfill the long-lost promise, there was no fees;

As I wrote & told; and wished too, to be read & heard,

When in exodus was no clause; Why in Grant preferred?

What grants with exigency do to many promised lands,