Pranav Chaturvedi (PC) - Poet/Blogger/Email: poet@jpranavc.com / jpranavc@gmail.com - Copyright (c) Material
Once upon a time there lived a man who lost everything,
Both under the rule of revered: Congress+ & BJP+, swings;
YET, he neither slandered Mr. Modi, nor the Gandhi Family,
Despite counting his own many losses over Banyan tree.
A criticism never evolves from what profits or losses made,
Knowing, even Silicon Valley’s low-slung policies, for it pays;
Ne’er ever succumb to this patriotic or unpatriotic chants,
When Mother(lands) only tattered its original Sons amidst;
You might sway to either side anticipating following truth,
Alas, protagonists in such theatrical acts were Ventriloquists!
As mother(lands) who first extracted energies with time,
A mother always (mostly), shalt stand beside you,
So shalt for mother(land), if you’re its original son;
Alas, if only mother(land) dejects love of such child,
Then, should there be love, respect, willful patriotism?
Gone are days where detriments were being made,
Once Late Mr. Kennedy spoke words:
Ask never what a nation did for you;
Rather, what you can do for it in herd,
And make such lands to sail through!
But I, a common man, a bit perplexed,
Maybe my earlier blog ( https://www.jpranavc.com/2024/04/the-logical-reason-why-israel-shouldnt.html ) didn’t reach to the desired eyes & ears in Israel, wherein I gave logical reasons why Israel shouldn’t accept US AID that was not only coming with several Caveats, but was also been processed out of discord & discussions in the house & senate that didn’t send a positive message of willful acceptance from all sides.
Alas, it happened. Problem is, when we’re accepting AID originating from discord & discussions, then the donor/giver would always want to control & interfere in every decision-making process of the donee/receiver, including the decisions to be made for national security.
Only two leaders evolved and professed,
And said, ‘We shalt infiltrate all those nations,
Who harbor(ed) the terror on their lands,
And bring World indispensable normalization!’
They had no legacies generational in politics,
Yet, several political ‘Dynasts’ chanted them as ‘dictators,’
And they had no wish to be god for the ‘World’,
Yet, the mainstream intoned them as ‘cult’ leaders.
Myriad defamations, insults, scandals made,
Not only by trolls, but also who wrote history & laws,
Many bounties floated against their thoughts,
By the same who made K-Ching under their rule,
Sipping in glass mansions, alas, in weedy lawns.
Two iron leaders who evolved despite resistance,
Unraveled how ravening are mainstream, politics in existence! 😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024
Technically, Ms. Ann Coulter being an original conservative, she’s logically correct in her arguments saying that she wants to elect a true evolutionary American nationalist, might be a Protestant with 200+ years of legacy, & not an Indian, in this case Vivek, in the elections. And indeed, she’s verily following the principles of what defines true conservatism. And had the Liberals followed the true principles of liberalism alike her around World, then things would’ve been different for globalization as well, and I wouldn’t have been writing this blog today. And ethically & logically, I’ve also agreed with the contentions given by the original Japanese, Indian, Chinese, Russian, South Korean, Zionists ‘conservatives’ as well (despite me being a proponent of one world one law one government one currency order). As, Japan lost its aesthetics post WW2, India lost that in 800 years of invasion-proselytism & loot, Zionists are still fighting for their promised land even after thousands of years, Russians too saw fall of tsars, Chinese witnessed colonial rule & poverty that led to rise in communism, & so goes for South Koreans as well; and many more.
But herein a caveat is involved in being conservative in the modern World. And I’m covering the same way I’ve covered modern liberal-leftists. When you’re more inclined towards being conservative, then the idea of global rule or dominance by that specific territory is implicitly struck-off from the wish-list at least. Take herein some examples:
Long back I coined this definition of Jobs & Experience -> ‘Performance Based Work Oriented Management.’
Every profession requires a particular kind of what you may call an implicit taste or trait. Sadly, we’ve buried that under the verbose imaginary Resumes, or, DEI. Take this example. Compare MTV’s late 90s to early 00s VJs, with, the later era of Music channels; you would yourself notice a difference. Similarly, in a fashion industry, a particular taste is required, but today, anyone with a degree in fashion tech & design can enter; alas, that hasn’t helped the fashion industry either. Have you lately seen the Calvin Klein Ad? Take another example. Coders with MBA can become policy makers. Is Silicon Valley an inspiration? Or mere a qualification of Public Policy will end you up drafting global policies. Result -> three decades and indispensable globalization collapsed. Look at the United Nations in the last four decades.
