What’s Mr. Trump’s Hush Money Case? It says of an ‘unlawful influence’ over elections by merely silencing a playboy Porn bunny, paying indirectly via reflecting reimbursement of such through, an Attorney. Correct?
Herein the words to be noted are -> ‘influence’ & ‘indirect’!
Before that, let’s accept there’s a difference between print/electronic mainstream acting as publisher vs what is consumed on social media. While in the former case, we can choose what to buy or subscribe or not; in the latter, it’s pestered upon via FEED, ‘TRENDING,’ or, as a RECOMMENDATION, which isn’t an ADVERTISEMENT, but merely based on your past SEARCHES, that remotely give meaningful results. Further, the User isn’t visiting any Specific Domain Web Portal, nor Subscribing to it like Netflix. Basically, herein, any Newsstand deciding what you should buy! Correct?