From U.S.A. to U.S.A. && C. An Overview!

 

From U.S.A. to now U.S.A. && C. wherein C stands for China. But a trillion dollar question. Would Millionaires in U.S.A. too hide or run alike, Jack Ma? And further, would Jack of Twitter alike renounce everything to charities, as such are products of Capitalism, or maybe escape to Himalayas, out of guilt? 

 

My allegiance is to NO Nation. This is my mantra, who hoped to witness Nations being ameliorated, because, long long back, mine deteriorated. And I’m not that ignorant, who would lecture a millennia old legacy without actually experiencing it, which require several generations being kindred to the same clan. But what China we are witnessing today isn’t the Original one.

Vibrations of Nations!

 

The reason why I support Trump is not Trumpism (which is territorial), BUT, because of Trump & Trump only, which is Global, and furthermore, who was one of the most important LEGO building block, along with other major aligned alike Global Leaders, needed to control a deteriorated World. 

 

There’s this one definition, or I say, misconception, which is famous & in verbatim chanted everywhere; that, only great economies build great Nations; which is of course a myth; or else, great Empires in the past wouldn’t have actually fallen like deck of cards.

Monoliths

 

A riveted art or mere manifestation?

Prints of which untraceable or testament?

What deeper it proclaim is time forthwith,

Which arrived as a call for another gift.

Rocket Scientist or Rocket Engineer?

 

A Rocket Engineer cannot build any functional Rocket without applying Principles of Science. Thence, technically, he/she is a Rocket Scientist & not Rocket Engineer. Science is plinth of Engineering & Technology. Science cannot be considered as mere Discovering or else Engineering & Technology too would become mere RE-Search & never Inventions.

Constructing Who……

Plinth & floors in no time,

All else locked but it shalt made to rise;

When noise no more felt nor pain,

Seeing, constructing who at last engaged.

Without ‘?,’ there’s no Science!

 

Let’s take example of Consciousness. We learned about it via expertise of different experts and each one of them can counter or ‘?’ others’ claims, findings & opinions. As, is it mere attentiveness or alertness or memory or subjective experience or illusions or intuitions or being awakened or sense of being awakened or cosmic external connection via energies & so on; but we were able to learn about its different forms. And that’s the beauty of Science! How? Because of presence of ‘?,’ counter findings, contradictory reviews; as nothing presently exists in singularity or in absolute. And shouldn’t be even considered in that perspective, at least up till present......

Don’t Shackle Science!

If you think, Science,

Is in absolute theorize;

Ain’t necessitated reviews then,

An outcome; & all obliged.

Masquerading are Your Masters!

 

If you think Globalism is restricted to mere cost benefit ratio, then you’re wrong. Similar to if you think those centuries/millennium/millennia old expansionists views had anything to do with trade or cultural diversity or reformation. Albeit I’m not including all Globalists, because there’re some who either are truly restricted to trade or want exchange of great ideas, but, they aren’t as powerful as those few individuals whose references you won’t even see in daily mainstream.

The Captain

The Captain once engaged to sail,

Ship, so sumptuous, all hailed;

Myriad beauty, sky high,

On deck, many, saying, goodbye.