There’s
a common saying, absence of evidence
doesn’t mean evidence of absence. Indeed, an ill-intent sowed perspective cannot be proven complicit
due to presence of free will (which again
is the foundation stone of this fabric). But its repercussions could be
observed & analyzed via direct & indirect impressions, with time. For
example, let’s say a complicit theory or doctrine is being floated. Now under
free will, cogent evidence against direct ill-will/ill-intent would always remain
absent, except, what could remain
would be observations w.r.t. indirect
deterioration of anything made to encircle it via expansive impressions, spread through mainstream or not. As
such perspectives cannot be made complicit too, the only way, not to reach till
that stage is, by keeping scent intact. Of what?