One couldn’t ascertain in any
jungle,
As all in unison or uniform are
traits?
If opined otherwise; aren’t any roads,
To traverse where one won’t be bait.
One couldn’t ascertain in any
jungle,
As all in unison or uniform are
traits?
If opined otherwise; aren’t any roads,
To traverse where one won’t be bait.
Revolutionize one cannot a system, closed,
As long as external influences surge;
And if within a system to all be
nurtured,
Then one shalt oust first who tried to purge!
IF from ashes of sacrifices modern
world built,
Against tyranny who stood &
fate tilted;
If assumed verbatim! World’s
inhabited with guileless,
Buried under own liabilities & complexes.
Who says who stays in race,
Decisive is one who never lose pace!
Alas! In muck if unidirectional
dragged,
Then change pace, so too track.
A defect in provision or law cannot be used to ascertain any fact or adhere to standards unless the defect in itself is first rectified or amended. One cannot circumvent the mere fact that interpretation matters & further, course of natural justice & interpretation of provisions would always collide, wherever genuinely needed. But where we have to circumvent depends on the situation involved & recipients. Hence, I would always contend for cognizance of perceptible evolutionary traits. And if not been taken, the interpretations done would dilute the whole meaning of circumventing which would only mean defect in conclusions.
Ain’t
wrong being conservative,
So
goes valuing liberal;
Blended
if, Empyrean!
Amidst, let authenticity always unfurled.
If Natural, welcomed, even its wrath,
But what if it isn’t & sown by few?
Once would be misfortune, twice
calamity,
And if ain’t acted, then never such eschewed.
If xRy, then yRx under Symmetry
in a certain Set.
Merely using
this as an analogy or metaphor or to elucidate the context of one recent research
conducted which attached strings of two distinct aspects of traits into one by
relating Virtuous to a Narcissist/Fascist. So, I conduce w.r.t. that analogy:
If
Virtuous -> Narcissist || Fascist, then Fascist || Narcissist ->
Virtuous.
Why screech then, if used either, as per symmetry?
Irrespective
of any affiliation to MSM or not or amount of coverage, whatsoever (categorically stating deterioration of quality
of main stream in the last couple of decades is not a myth), idea of cancel
culture is appalling. But again emerges its two variants:
· Territorial
· Global