Look behind

IF from ashes of sacrifices modern world built,

Against tyranny who stood & fate tilted;

If assumed verbatim! World’s inhabited with guileless,

Buried under own liabilities & complexes.

Shred

Who says who stays in race,

Decisive is one who never lose pace!

Alas! In muck if unidirectional dragged,

Then change pace, so too track.

Circumventing Defect

A defect in provision or law cannot be used to ascertain any fact or adhere to standards unless the defect in itself is first rectified or amended. One cannot circumvent the mere fact that interpretation matters & further, course of natural justice & interpretation of provisions would always collide, wherever genuinely needed. But where we have to circumvent depends on the situation involved & recipients. Hence, I would always contend for cognizance of perceptible evolutionary traits. And if not been taken, the interpretations done would dilute the whole meaning of circumventing which would only mean defect in conclusions.

Blended

Ain’t wrong being conservative,

So goes valuing liberal;

Blended if, Empyrean!

Amidst, let authenticity always unfurled.

If Natural…...

If Natural, welcomed, even its wrath,

But what if it isn’t & sown by few?

Once would be misfortune, twice calamity,

And if ain’t acted, then never such eschewed.

Symmetry

If xRy, then yRx under Symmetry in a certain Set.

Merely using this as an analogy or metaphor or to elucidate the context of one recent research conducted which attached strings of two distinct aspects of traits into one by relating Virtuous to a Narcissist/Fascist. So, I conduce w.r.t. that analogy:

If Virtuous -> Narcissist || Fascist, then Fascist || Narcissist -> Virtuous.

Why screech then, if used either, as per symmetry?

Cancel Culture

Irrespective of any affiliation to MSM or not or amount of coverage, whatsoever (categorically stating deterioration of quality of main stream in the last couple of decades is not a myth), idea of cancel culture is appalling. But again emerges its two variants:

·       Territorial

·       Global

Poor/Rich Debate

Firstly, whoever laid the foundation of ‘cancel culture’ everywhere must never be defended ‘anywhere’ when they themselves suffer its impact!

Secondly, the Poor/Rich debate is old & several partisan arguments - counter arguments can be put & published. Material of that too is available in libraries (online/within walls). But all are almost similar. Selfsame ideologies involved with similar outlandish uninteresting concepts & definitions from universal basic income to taxing rich to free everything to share in the production & profit to state hold to private hold to PPP to ruckus & riots to demands to unions to revolution to let them eat cakes to 1% to silent voices to control over economies to manipulated markets to few funders to world police to loan waivers & it goes on & on & on.

Fall of Learning!

What foremost Centres of Learning became!

Who were revered by their mere names;

Labefaction instituted back, maybe two decade,

Schooled! Never Educated! What a shame!