Historical Aspects!

A Neophyte Questions Substantially. Followers on the behest of whom they Follow are good at Nipping coz that’s their Academy.

Now the Historians’ distinct perspectives, though all true, only conclude into distinct Philosophies with divulged perceptions. Though with the evolving cognition, a trend to question the existence of all perspectives, thus leading us to divulged beliefs and not to any one precisely, which is furthermore impliedly a healthy belief in itself. But to whom more inclination should be given as a matter of fact, forged by transparency, as who should be considered as an impeccable Icon, that’s where the question ensues.

A Learner won’t dissect each and every piece of information unless kindred to the said subject specific domain. A Learner would go through distinct conceptualized Historical Facts concluded by any Historian only waking his ‘preferential’ part of cognition which will then conceive as, on which Fact or Entity he should believe or follow. But that would again be a personal perspective.

Though Historians uses distinct modules and existing historical facts to conclude chronologically the reasons for any cause or action, still their own philosophies and ideologies might play a certain role in surmising or concluding the historical facts into documentation. They might be selective, protective, descriptive,  affirmative, reactive, creative or reflective while comprehending facts. And though many of them come with impeccable backgrounds, their perspectives would differ on the same historical fact though inclusively everything would be true.

But even if their protectiveness or ideological inclination plays a certain role, they should also unfold the true facts even if it ends up unraveling any icon being a beholder of wrong demeanor at any given particular of time. The Learner could then conclude whether that instance was coercion, compulsion, necessity or a mere idiosyncratic temperament.

Furthermore the Projectors also play an important role in Projecting any Entity as how reasonably or in which flair or flavor they project anything. The existing Projectors at any given point of time shouldn't recline and watch the making of the facts but should also project the facts categorically.

Thence, Learners would never go and keep corroborating the Historical facts with other existing antithesis theories unless they are working on any assignment or contemplating them with an interest or are an associates to this specific domain. Whenever and whoever project a Historical Entity as an Icon or unfolding any Historical Fact, the Historians first shedding their Personal Ideological Perspectives, Opinions and Differences, should collectively come to a conclusion which the Learners could understand with deep Thoughts. The only thing is to find not the spotless but the facts with less spots.

Copyright ©  Pranav Chaturvedi 2015

Is Narcissism in Vogue?

So, is Narcissism standardized, is in vogue and used as a constructive tool to appraise to conduce one’s efficacious Individuality. There were Researches conducted where from Selfies to taking cognition of Societal Stature were all made kindred to the aspect of enduring with Narcissism. And then, there were Counter Researches Negating these antecedent Theories. That’s why we call it Re-Search, Searching what has already been searched but coming with distinct substantiated outcomes, if any.

The Moment we come across to this locution, we start making abstract shapes and structures of some Merciless Entities. What we forget that this expression can also be effectuated while describing or comprehending idiosyncratic identities. Now few questions ensue:

1. Are Excessive Promotional Adventures, cramped up to discrete notion which further restricted at individualistic level, is an indication of, not may be entirely, but a tinge of being impregnated with Narcissism?

2. Can it live in both Dormant and Active Phase while in latter transmuting into being merciless and in the former, being excessively obsessed? 

3. Is on Social Platforms or otherwise, exhibiting the snapshots, in Excessive, of the clan or family one is directly kindred to, could be substantiated as being a part at minuscule level of being Narcissistic?

4. Giving more priority to one’s stature thus defying any protocol at the time to save the repute among the enthusiasts could be said to be the beholder of this obnoxious expression?

There is a distinction between Self-Respect and being Self Obsessed. The one defined in the supra points are the features of the Latter not of the Former. Self Respect is when he who doesn't care of the outcome following the right 'Instincts', right or wrong, which even may lead that entity and force him to drift against the tides. That cannot be surmised as being adamant, rude or rough. That’s simply self respect. The Selfless is another distinguished expression not associated with the supra denomination.

Thence, it’s not conclusive and not deniable also that this vile expression is somehow becoming a part of the habitat. From intemperate obsession about your own Stature to finding the Recognition among the extensive societal, is this expression unfolding itself covering everything under the same blanket?          

All the suppositions are made considering this expression only at the Excessive Level. 

Copyright © of Pranav Chaturvedi

Parallelism of Perceptions!

Wondering, why always the coherence between the perceptions dwindle even before reaching to any denouement which may be a necessity for any Model. If we Segregate Perceptions aka Point of Views, Four categories would Evolve:

·         From Projectors Point of View:

This Type is the most Hegemonized and thus Command most part of the Republic. Their Analogies are utterly Complex where Deciphering the Background as why they chose such conclusions is arduous. Mere Business Desires or on a veracious belief is a complex structure to unravel the mystic beliefs.

·          From Social Point of View:

The Social Structure is Complex too. Is it the unwarranted Justifications,  thence surmised into Theory or Mere in the Hope of Recognition among the extensive Societal as to be perceived with approbation, concluding would be strenuous.

·          From  Legal Point of View:

·         From Organizational Point of View:

Adopted with the selfsame Parlance, this follows a pre defined Protocol. Protect the Wrong Inside, Ambush the Unimpeachable outside. This is not a Pattern, but a Static Cohesive Perspective.

Distinct Perceptions is a Healthy Practice and should be Part of Every Republic. But  while accomplishing the essence of what might be the need of an Hour, the Sectarian Issues and Beliefs transpire with no cohesion between the Point of Views, profoundly accepting that the same analogies traversing towards the wrong. Is it the Personal Aspirations or Standing with each other in Sectarian just to achieve idiosyncratic goals without making cohesion negating realization of what would be the required outcome, collectively.

Onerous to Explain!! 

Note: All My Blogs are Subjected to Copyrights. All Rights Reserved.

Is Being Schooled -> Being Educated Precise?

Taking this Fine Thought and Concept of Someone who has transcribed this notion that Being Schooled doesn't mean one transmutes into an Educated Being, there also exist this distinct Notion of Being Schooled and Being Educated.

But the Conclusion Somehow is missing. Mere concentrating towards providing Better Amenities has been made the only Theory existing for Better Learning. No Doubt it does play a significant Role, but eventually symbolizing this as the utmost concern discharging other factual phenomena would be a mistaken belief.

Schooling and herein not limited to this word in verbatim but expanded more towards the Higher level also: So What’s Schooling? Is it a Pattern? A Pattern with same dimensions with certain selfsame classification of excellence. A Pattern with the curriculum which constitutes a concept. A Pattern which encompass beings within its surroundings producing selfsame Products. So would be an errand, undertaken for the band or for distinguished groups under one Structure? It might be not a wrong belief which is further somehow bewildering!

But Could the Schooling would impliedly make a Being, Educated. On several occasions, even many ‘Scholars’ have acknowledged, affirming this snag but the Pattern has never changed its path. Might be when defining or expanding this concept, the significance of only acceptance from one being kindred to the same band doesn't actually expands the competence but creates lot of more concerns.

In exploring Horizon, there are always Permutations and Combinations that are implemented while testing the readings which may lead us to what we may be looking at. But it is this Band or group that first needs to change its perception the way it perceives the surroundings within the system. Might be the Pattern is not wrong but the Perception of comprehending the other existing attributes amid the system are disregarded.

Being Educated is when we comprehend and understand the entire system and not just the concerns and significance of the conclusions made by those kindred to a Band. The latter one would be Being Schooled. But Treating Schooled -> or proportional to Educated would be somehow imprecise. 

Note: All my blogs are subjected to Copyrights

The Notion of Being Decent!!

Sometimes! ERR! Always Adapting the Methodologies without any hunch or query Not with Respect to the any Technical Part, obviously unless an Alternate Theory is subsisting or Defined, but those implemented towards the Social System, is a Tradition. But Narrowing down to the Social Perspective, where now, the Definition of Decency is more or Less debased.  One doesn't have to meticulously go through the tedious Technical Analysis or Study of Data while making any inference towards, where one can conduce to some conclusion.

But if Decency is Defined as the Requirements of Accepted or Respectable Behaviour or the Behaviour that conforms to accepted standards of morality or respectability, who would conform the more accurate predefined Accepted Respectable Behaviour? Why? Because if the accepted behaviour which presumably concocted with the Refined Education Imparted to the Decision Makers at any Level would have been refined, than such Social Chaos anywhere wouldn't have been Existed. Would it be Decent to be good in playing Politicking Hunger Games by remaining Numb? Would it be Decent to Learn Not to be Emotional? Would it be Decency to Learn or Teach to make Enthusiasts learning's diluted for their own purpose? Would it be Decent not to Accept your Fault which preposterously been Taught everywhere?  And such demeanors are Accepted by the Enthusiasts. With no conformity of Wrong or Right, and Neither of Those wanting to Resurrect the Enthusiasts propositions because of the insecurity about losing their own position. But Without Reacting, Abusing and Using well versed language, Pleasing: would it be Decency?

  

The Developing Phase concentrate to project an entity with an Attitude with a Good Approach Learnt but which might not be an Implied Decency. How would a Person conclude that the Appearance has avoided impropriety or immodesty? How? How would those Fake Manners or demeanor be differentiated from Decency in verbatim? Could the Decency be Goodness towards the Good and the Bad too OR Goodness only towards the Good? Here Goodness is adapted in verbatim with no Motive or Opportunism diluted with it.

An Emotional Angry Homosapein could be Decent; Also an Unemotional Bloke with good refined presentable attitude with no tinge of anger but only a smile, might not be Decent.

Like Decency Doesn't generate while kindred to any Dynasty or Fraternity or to any Household or Profession, the same cannot be acquired on the Basis of Selection. Which to me also is paradoxical. Still would be Learning. But equating Standard with Decency would be Wrong and Concocted Learning.

Copyright ©  Pranav Chaturvedi 2014

Values!

So, wouldn't it be preposterous to conduce in the acceptance of someone’s Values in a more superior approach by the existence of mere fact that the social judgment relied on the conception of singularity with no inferences made from divergent understandings and thoughts, narrowing to what are the essentials or basic things of great significance that needs to be fulfilled as requirements, especially leading to one important aspect: existence and projection of his/her representatives in the form of kindred descendants, Clan or other Menage in the Social Arena? So when, this individual bloke with his/her descendants or whoever kindred to same tree, complete the Holy Accomplishments, would be projected as the beholder of Superior Values even if his caring and giving’s are limited for his clan or tree only. But could this Theory be Justified? Or could this person if in Social Arena, projects himself as a caring bloke towards his/her lineage or household Members and give justifications, as he too being kindred to a Family, thus impliedly making this being the beholder of good Values. Would be right? Not Necessarily!!

But if you scrupulously observe, these blokes are being considered in the social arena subsisting with good values by mere following the herein supra guidelines.

It is an unwarranted truth that has been accepted so far but not so good. Precisely the truth might be is when we confuse ourselves and amalgamate ‘Responsibility’ and ‘Values’. A Bloke devoted and kindred towards his own clan fulfilling the adjudged social necessities are ‘Responsibilities’ not ‘Values’. But how far he has gone or one would stretch himself/herself, engulfing the wrongful or righteous demeanor to accomplish the adjudged necessities, that is when the seeds of Values are sown. And from the point when that demeanor was evolved while adopting theories to justify one’s standing and standard in the Social Arena to establish his/her persona, is where one should evaluate Values and not by mere succumbing to some adopted measures which are nothing but Responsibilities.

The crestfallen part is in the social arena, especially the projectors within the system, endorses the concept of former supra propositions or hypothesis as the barometer to adjudge one’s Values which is Not deplorable but sorrowful.  

Note: All my blogs are subjected to Copyrights

   

My Quotes: With Retrospective Effect.

• Amusing; to Accept the Contents by a mere Existence of Credentials and Dismal that the Disapproval is Discarded in the Absence of the Latter;
• After Witnessing the Bloodshed of Humans 100 Years Back, We still have Not worked on our Anger Management;
• Today's F. Luthans Theory in short: Successful Managers(Proportional to Playing Politicking Hunger Games in Social Arena) >> Effectiveness;
• This Stats; And I know am Bad; But kind of Masters in Pragmatism from the Department of Calculative Studies to Suppress Essential Facts;
• Even if what Franklin has said is heeded, then too, Justice would be Served to the outraged unaffected and NEVER to the Outraged Affected;
• Mentorship is not to Mentor an A++ Bloke. The Real Deal comes when you Mentor an F Grade Mentee;
• Never take out your Own Sword Coz their Karmas would be Judged by Lord. Thence whatever happens; Leave Everything on God;
• The Vernacular pursued for the Authenticity is Changed; Companionship & Discernment is probably All Arranged;
• When Mentors would Equalize their Teachings with Investments; Politicking Fawning & Expediency in Future would have Reverence;
• Computed News; Corrected Views; Mere Dust; or A Disgust; For Fame; Enthusiasts are Same; Amid Them All; Sail in Forlorn;
• A Society may change its Standard of Living but How that would transmute their Level of thinking, that's bit Confusing;
• The Poorer the Land, more Hunger Games its inhabitants learn to play; Wealthier enwreathed w/ Insecurity not Illuminate but spread dismay. 
• One May Stand Alone Among Billions Forever; The Proclivity of Virtue is Accepted for Whom it Really Matters;
• A Being Sans Emotions becomes Selfish; But it Ushers Us to the Triumph or in the End Simply Make Us Perish;
• Righteousness never conceive only from Sanctity.But never been conceived in life would be an Adversity;
• Not to be a Compulsive Enthusiast; Just Repudiation of Servitude; Mere Exploration with Contingent Upshot; Cannot be Surmised as Attitude;
• Issues which can be Simply untwined or determined: but exists no desire; B'coz to tumefy it initially, a strategy, which is adored & admired;  
• Some became Immortals, Some Legends, coz their Defenders Claimed; Gradually conquered the Fear & Greed in this discordant cosmic game;
• Some Beings first analyze their concocted share; Then accordingly gush out their opinions on any policy or public despair;
• Beings Leverage for an Award but what exactly it Is; A Propitious Process with an auspicious Product with Thousands of Kisses;
• Things scamper on Collective 'Sentiments': Markets, Politics or Decency; At Personal Propensity sinks it's essence leaving it with No Intensity;
• Politics should not be considered as Profession against Consideration; Notion of What is Acquired or Lost only Degenerates its Compassion;
• Questioning the dubiety if exists is essential to galvanize Trust; But the Former's Inception shouldn't be muddled with Mucky Dust;
• Factual Negativity is When to Stipulate & Stalk "Anything' to build a Path; Not when Efforts are Effectuated to Explore Light in the Dark;
• Some Entities befriend others only to Repel any Third Entity; And Still we say the Social System should Embrace Virtue & Tranquility; 
• Who knows, the way the facts are unveiled, is truth or any mucky Plan; Unknown aspirations as why a Being is projected as Sterling or a Boogeyman; 
• Think No words should be praised such as Mass or Class; Exist only Thoughts, Further Fractured into Two: Intense or Crass;
• Contributors & The Box; And Their Insulting Thoughts; An Open Bazaar; With The Projectors, Descendants & Devoted Pals. 
• Those who may object the Thoughts are not Strong; Only Four Words would Conceive: "First Prove It Wrong"!
• Moving Frames; A Faux Smile For The Name; No Stand; But On Situation it Depend; Disposition is Their Best Mate; True Liking Never Actuate;
• No Pledge to Please the Perceptions of All is Taken; But the Logic Behind any Notion or Thought should be Worthy and Unshaken.
• Slurping an Emancipated Thought; Outlandish & Undraped; Some Particles are Deceptively Illuminated; Gravity of Perceptions Can't be Escaped;
• If Serious Issues cannot be rescued by Glittering Lockers or CV;There would always be them to Pamper you: Our Beloved Papers & TV;
• Amusing; TO Keep Pleasing With No Logic or Stand; Has Been Made One of the Precedent by Some Under The Ambit of 'Decency' With this Fact;
• Retrospective or Prospective; Decisions should be Made keeping Fair Justice in Perspective;
• Thou May Worth from Zero to Infinity; Only Few Prudent Contented Eyes would be Beholder of Thy Humanity;
• May Still Value Your Thoughts & Venture Even If It Doesn't Reach Far; But Would It Be Efficacious Enough If Buttressed With Puffery Stars;
• If conclusions cannot be affirmed on Perceptions; Then why also Veracity of a Channelized Path Erected with Facts Wholly is a Virtuous Inception;
• Why some Memoir unfolds fragility & assertions; Why no words spoken then, When perceiving those impuissant people under desertion;
• Know The Enthusiasts Would always be More & Grow; The Belief would always be Admired, With The Rats One Must Flow;
• 'The Unapproachable' never asked Disciples or Preachers in the World to 'Individually' skedaddle & build Share; Their Existence was restricted to Preach & with Time Upgrade Preaching to Educate the Schooled dwell in Despair. 
• Content over Collaborations, Sagacious over Erose; Quality over Quantity, Definitive over Verbose.
• Noble 'Genes' would always Contend for The Way Forward & Solutions First; Even if Vanquished in any Contrived Fabric or succumb to Traits & Unjust.
• For those who take the refuge of doctrines are debilitated; And when narratives are transformed then objectives become faded.

  Note: All My Blogs are Subjected to Copyrights. All Rights Reserved.

Standards & Thoughts!

A society can reorient and transform its standard of living but how would it divulge Standard of Thinking, that’s pretty confounding to my cognition. The Oeuvres, been accepted not before but only after taking cognizance at large of the existence of the bonafide credentials. But wouldn’t that Being amid blindfolded enthusiasts? Precisely Affirmative.

Being connoisseur of one specialty might not be proportional to be a wizard for everything. But this concept, is given a red carpet welcome, by mere fulfilling what needs to be done following what others might have done and the disapprovals been confined to a pretty solitary existence.

One can make a palace on the barren land but can’t cultivate on it. Thence, the root, base and level of the thoughts can affirmatively never be transmuted. And if it is, then to a limited extent as long as the personal aspirations are fulfilled. A bygone saying as you cannot surmise one’s persona until you eat five kgs of salt with him. Means, that much time it takes for any bloke to establish credibility of any person in front of his eyes. But that’s at the individual level. Thence, when a connoisseur with a locus of being under the divine with former glistening credentials, is projected to be a wizard for everything, the conception of issues arise wearing a gap of missing knowledge and teachings. Here might the three factual positions of mentorship as earlier mentioned, conceive.

The ship is not abandoned when standing for the truth but when one stops equalizing everything with ackers as one always should.

Concluding, the concept of Standardizing the acceptance of Thoughts and Levels by mere uplifting the Standards and Credentials would not be appropriate. Only the petals of the rose give you gleeful warmth not the thorns.     

   

Note:All my Blogs are subjected to Copyrights.

Glittering Opulence!

Statistically, we can make distinct inferences by segregating systems in the social arena populated by the distinct ideologies with establishments proportional to their standards. It might be a bygone and unknown saying: You can’t expect someone to be an Angel who hasn't been raised in Heaven. But subsequently this too precisely is an undisputed and undeniable fact that the good teachings can alter the dimensions of cognition taking the affected towards the path of good. But inference cannot be concluded too that the beholder of solace would be the disciple of great teachings.

Without any hunch, the conduct can diverge according to the system. But it’s the conscience which purely defines a man. Now narrowing down to the context referring to the opulence, and it may encompass anything, from knowledge to glittering solids, if you perceive scrupulously the effect of instant opulence, the actions subjected to the persona is recoiled in the almost selfsame approach. A well affluent would be in a state of Insecurity . A poor would precisely be in a locus of being unbalanced. And the Middle would be in a temper of being namby pamby and self centered against the right. And a more conclusive amalgamated term would be an unbalanced insecure being where the definitions would only be transmuted to its antithesis when being personally aggrieved but to the extent and until the edge where they define themselves.

There is absolutely no wrong defining yourself under any predefined edge. But when to maintain that threshold, any being alters, mutates or manipulates and distorts the system or any individual within that system, then no inference can be concluded to any extent and thence all those kindred to distinct social arenas are then defined within the same concept and standards.

Note: All my Blogs are subjected to copyrights