Innocent Women/Honesty Grievance Cell for Organizations!!!! Indispensable.

I will always contend to have a separate INDEPENDENT Women Grievance Cell for Innocent Women in every Organization, be it Public or Private.

The recent Woman IAS suspension fighting for probity worries me a lot.

How about those Women who Fight like her in Corporate or other Organizations?? Either they are Fired or Anguished.

My Contention is: Would any Organization take action against an employee, even after knowing the improper persona or conduct of that person, who brings  huge business to him. NOPE. I don’t know the stats coz I am not sure whether such stats even exists.

And why only concentrate on Women. Why can’t we have HONESTY Grievance Cell in every Organization!

Furthermore, why can’t we have Ethics and Moral Science Training Sessions in every Organization on weekends? That’s indispensable!!

Note: All my blogs are subjected to copyright.

Student-Institute Relationship---is it a Contract?

Well, this is confounding to me. Is any Education Institute's relationship with a Student a Contract? And what does that mean? For non payment of Fees, can an Education Institute ask any guileless student to leave the Institution in the midterm or mid session? What if only a year or two are left for completion?

Can it be perceived as a non payment of remuneration?

Furthermore, is an Education Institute-University relationship a Contract of Agency? Because an Institute provide degrees of some other University who can be perceived as principal.

Thence, can the Student-Institute relationship be comprehended as a Contract?

If Yes, would it be Fair?

And in such cases, what could be the role of the University?

And if it’s fair, it would be utterly unfair!

Note: All my Blogs herein are subjected to Copyright.

Retrospective Relief.

Recent SC decision quashing MCI to hold NEET Examination unfolds one more proposition according to my understanding.

It says MCI cannot conduct the NEET Examination but “its verdict will not affect the admissions which have already taken place”. And according to my cognition what does that mean? “A conduct of any Authority in the past, if it was not qualified to commit that, but if it had committed it, should not make the innocent and guileless people, who were the direct recipients of that conduct, get affected. And what does that mean? People can get relief retrospectively too.”

Well, I have not read the entire decision and my opinion purely depends on the news headlines I have perceived. So, validity of my opinion is on “AS IS” basis and is subjected to get changed.

Propound to Abate Dowry Practices!

Why not, to impede dowry, introduce a bill which would state that:

"No person would be allowed to spend more than Five Times of his monthly salary, which includes a businessman’s Five Times of whatever he makes monthly. The Father of the bride should disclose this amount to an Authority (created by the bill) which would also include the gifts transferred. If the Father fails to disclose the correct amount, he would be liable for Fine or any other Simple Punishment. The Groom and his Father would also be be charged with the same punishment. Provided that the Bride’s Father would be allowed to Transfer any property or dibs in his Daughter’s favor, but the said property and monetary sum would always be vested in the Bride’s and her children's favor only."

So how it would affect:

First: People, including Grooms family who compel the Bride’s Family for extravagant expenditure in their daughters marriage would Cease.

Second:It wont put burden on the Bride’s Father for his Daughters' marriage.

Third: This would include Gifts. Thence, one cannot compel or coerce any Man to bestow Indirect Dowry.

Fourth: This would be a faithful marriage as both sides would comprehend each other pellucidly.

Fifth: Both the parties would be required to disclose the expenditure. This would make sure that both the bride’s and groom’s family were not indulged in any sort of dowry act or there was any coercion or pressure from either side.

Sixth: Concluding,if a person is making 1 Crore a month, he would only be allowed to spend 5 Crore on his daughter’s marriage. And a person who is earning 5 Thousand a month, he would be allowed to spend only 25 Thousand on his daughter’s marriage including gifts. Simple.                 

The Legality of any marriage is directly proportional to the Registration of Marriage and Marriage Certificate and Inversely to the sum exhausted. 

Furthermore, I understand, this wont be welcomed by those believing in show-offs or who deem to consider to maintain their mirage or sham image in the society. But trust me, this would certainly abate dowry practices.   

Copyright ©  Pranav Chaturvedi 2013

Is it a Rightful Revenge?

I am perplexed if I am correct, but what I perceive is, a sense to take REVENGE from each other has started in the last few years.

Ok, so you stood up against the Wrong, and precisely, not followed the orders: Thence, we have invented distinct cases against you. These already existed but were never discovered as we didn’t give importance coz you were neither important nor things were swinging in your favour. But now, we have perceived your popularity and importance, so these issues recuperate importance and are novel inventions. Thence, fight it till infinitude.

When you put a question: why no action for so long against him, when it was in the public domain: as anticipated, No Response.

But the following underneath could be the reasons:

•  How Dare this person stood against the wrong?
•  Forthcoming, his success could be comprehended!
•  Revenge!  

The contention would be. When the issues flare up, the facts should be corroborated and subsequently action should be taken. But saving these issues to dig it in future also unfolds the improper stance of the other party and that could be considered as wrongful motive; Unless the Other Party was financially weak with no power to oppose former.

Note: All my Blogs herein are subjected to Copyright.

Don't Stop Moral Science in 9th Std.!

See, I am not a psychologist, so there may be antagonism to the said averments that:

“Can you expect from a person to fight against corruption or wrong, who:

• Either has earned new wealth and power & coz of that he has gone mad about the same;
• Who already has a lot of wealth and he being insecured and timid about losing the same;

Ethics vs Profit

Recently a top Company sacked its CEO on Women Exploitation charges. 

Well the Companies who find their employees guilty of any such conduct, should sack them instantly?

Dropouts Want Tier A

Its very amusing to perceive that people who were college dropouts and have become big Entrepreneurs in Technology seeks resume from Tier A Institute only, without any Year Gaps in it. I would comprehend it as not respecting the Intellect.

Slander or Personal Loss!

So, at the time of Background Check in new organization, any old organization or its Managers, mendaciously and deliberately share negative feedback with the recent one, which further diminishes the prospects of the candidate of either getting affirmation from the present one or been purposely and willfully been suffocated at the work so he/she quit by himself. Doesn't it amount to defamation or personal loss?

In my Opinion, Affirmatively YES!