Take these TWO Examples:
- 1. Let’s say a particular fellow, Subject Z, comes out with an idea of a Round Tyre Structure for any mode of transport, millennia back. Subject Z is surrounded by 10 People who are responsible to Ratify, Broadcast. As Karma is related to ethics, code of conduct, behavior, character; Subject Z is also well versed in that. Yet, 10 people junks Subject Z’s model & code of conduct. NOW, as per the definition of Karma, you would opine that it is Subject Z’s Past Birth's ‘Bad’ KARMA, that he/she is paying for. But what was the Real Reason? That 10 People didn’t pay attention to an important concept, model of Subject Z!
- 2. Let’s say now Subject Y takes the same model from Subject Z, without acquiring from Z, and present with the same/similar conception, in front of another 10 people; and in the end, a lucrative deal is signed, wherein Subject Y accomplishes his/her goals! Despite these 10 people knowing about Y’s background, Yet! Further, let’s add that Subject Y is contrary to code of conduct or character. What would you opine now under the definition? That this is Subject Y’s Past ‘Good’ KARMA, that’s why Subject Y was able to accomplish in this birth. But what was the Real Reason? That 10 people instead of rejecting it, accepted it!
So, how KARMA could be further defined? It furthermore depends upon you are surrounded by what & whom! Had 10 people in Example 1 taken the correct cognizance, then Result would’ve been different! And had 10 people in Example 2 refused Y, then Result would’ve been different. If we swap both decisions now, then the definition of KARMA sits in the perfect Lego block!
On a larger scale, the definition of KARMA or KARMIC Cycle or Yuga remains the same; but what I’ve elucidated above, should also be considered!
ARJUN won the War because he was guided by the Intellect of one Avatar! Swap; and the result would’ve been different.
Think about it!😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024