Pranav Chaturvedi (PC) - Poet/Blogger/Email: poet@jpranavc.com / jpranavc@gmail.com - Copyright (c) Material
I still remember, when Mr. Bolsonaro got defeated, the liberal media jumped in joy, some even indirectly & unnecessarily called: fall of fascism! (YAWN)! But to their surprise, Mr. Lula didn’t take a second to condemn the policies of West. A setback to the mainstream, who seems to be addicted calling everyone fascist, in the name of Inclusivity!
Now, may be I'm wrong,
and indeed need some illumination on this, Yet:
Nobel always cite the WILL of Late Mr. Alfred Nobel; and it seems, one sentence that makes the terms both impossible condition & contradictory, and that seems to have been also modified by the executors as well, without being explicitly mentioned and signed by the testator w.r.t. modification; and that is, to execute the WILL: during the ‘preceding’ year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind…..for….Important Discovery OR Invention in: Physics, Chemical, Physiology/Medicine, Literature (outstanding work in Idealistic direction), Abolition reduction of standing armies/establishment and promotion of peace congresses/advance fellowship among the nations.
Heard about the WILL of NOBEL, as the same be conferred to those “who have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind!”
Take this hypothetical example w.r.t. Inventions: Let’s say the person who invented Telescope, witnessed the exponential rise of it, on a larger scale; and at no point there’s anyone stating that we must un-invent Telescope, or its foundation wasn’t beneficial! Now, this should be considered as the ‘greatest benefit to mankind’, a gift whose foundation so far has not been questioned, and it has witnessed the exponential rise in its making!
Recently, I came across to a video wherein an IITian proudly stating that, they’re the first preference for visa across World, and started mentioning the countries they’re living in. Issue was, this gentleman was narrating this in front of academicians, and received an applause for the same too. The problem with this statement is: He basically equated himself and others to mere a user commodity, alike oil & avocados; and not the originator of the products that being used for export; YET, somehow, audience gave this gentleman a resounding applause. I can give this grad who seems to be a juvenile for me, w.r.t. life experiences a benefit of doubt; but what about others? Because, haven’t you heard the places which export(ed) labourers from their lands, and what they were/are being called or considered as in the history books?
Furthermore, please remember that every recession, turmoil, discord, too originated VIA a person from any Ivy League only; doesn’t matter whether that Ivy League belongs to West or EAST!
Scene 3: Coffee Shop
Ms. Harris is sipping on Americano (Black). Mr. Trump orders Frappuccino, and joins Her.
Mr. Trump: ‘I defeated 1st ‘H’; I’ll defeat another ‘H’; I can defeat Triple ‘H’!’,
Ms. Harris: ‘Merely with support of Mr. RFK Jr, Thiel, Musk, in A(J)’d’vance?’;
Mr. Trump: ‘Didn’t you hear originally; what AOC, Newsom, & Sanders said?’
Ms. Harris: ‘But the Obamas’, Clintons’, Silicon Valley; forged my Chance!’
I was casually watching Time Bandits series (2024) on Apple TV; albeit, this is made for Kids, to make them understand about the history of the World, on a very lighter note; Yet, in the end, a choice is being given to the child (Kevin), as to whom should he give the Universe Map (via which anyone can travel anywhere). Whether to Supreme Being, or, to the Evil? Dilemma in it is: Supreme Being (God) is in a process of bringing Mass Extinction to the World to Create Earth 2.0 (A well thought proposition, a fresh start); Whereas, his Antagonist (Evil) offers Not to destroy the World in its entirety, BUT, to bring more Misery and make the World more Miserable.
This was a good Dilemma! And Kevin thinks, if God is going to destroy everything, then there won’t be any memories left also; thus, he decides to give the Map to the Evil; albeit there was a twist in the end!
NOW:
What option Sri-Lanka had post revolution? Noting! Besides, now being at the alms of IMF, then and now! This is what Critics Laundering Program achieve at the end of the day. The laundered Critics makes money, multiply, live a posh life! Whilst the rest, end up being clowns! B’Desh chose the same. Now, it has 3 options against it:
1. Join China, in which case, eventually, it might, have to collaborate with PAK again, due to former’s close relations with it; against which they fought Independence five decades back, and sacrificed. DÉJÀ VU;
2. Allow NATO to build its base, in which case, it would make China its direct Enemy, and becoming another Ukraine of South Asia;
3. Befriend India; in which case, Mrs. Shiekh Hasina might return to B’Desh, and once again participate in the Elections, and the chances are that, she might again Win! So, what was the Revolution all about?
Scene 2: Coffee Shop
Mr. Xi is Sipping Mocha Grande. Mr. Modi Enters &
Joins him.
Mr. Xi: ‘Look NaMo! If it’s about any J.V.; then Science has no Motherland; but, Scientists do!’
Mr. Modi: ‘I ain’t here for any J.V.. Tell me, departing from Populated Market, who guided You?’
Mr. Xi: ‘In the beginning, there maybe a deal to split Capitalism-Communism; World into Two!’
Mr. Modi: ‘So that cheap labour would originate from East in name of equality, & sail through?’
Mr. Xi: ‘Then maybe, maybe, stepped beyond the territories that was being assigned, to rule,’
Mr. Modi: ‘Indeed! In name of Debt-Trap Diplomacy, Expansionism; going back to old school?'
Scene 1: Coffee Shop
Mr. Putin enters vehemently; and sits opposite to Aunt E.U., who’s sipping Mocha Tall.
Mr. Putin: ‘As if you didn’t know! SS, East India Company, ne’er died!’
Aunt E.U.: ‘OH Putin San! You, Mr. Trump; & your conspiracies-> divine!’
Mr. Putin: ‘But even the hon’ble Pope absolved me; YET, you blame!’
Aunt E.U.: ‘ I’m a single Mother of 27; who savor on modern flames.’
Mr. Putin: ‘Had it not been Sam or Xi SAN, then, where you’ve been?’
Aunt E.U.: ‘Don’t bring my past memories, nor ever my love, in between!’
Mr. Putin: ‘You’re proud of Scandinavian welfare? Less people! No big deal!’
Aunt EU: ‘Seems, Gotham here! Gotham there! Gotham everywhere!’
Elon: ‘Indeed! Myriad riddles, awaiting renewals; lands tuned clowns!’
Aunt EU: ‘Sigh! At least you’ve only 12/11; but I’ve to take care of 27!’
Elon: ‘All Adults! Unshackle ‘em! Not wasting in defending pronouns.’
Aunt EU: ‘Corbyn’s son Starmer said that you brought riots to his town?’
In any country, wherein every second person is either an activist; or a politician; or a critic; or a forever victim card holder; or proselytized; or sitting in the tuition classes fulfilling what the invaders told to do so i.e. 10+2+3/4+2 as that’s the only way to come out of poverty; and wherein there’s absolutely no respect for the evolution; wherein masquerade many as the originals; or, wait for the approval of others as what success means; then in that scenario, such countries don’t get GOLD.
And then, even one Medal looks like as if conquered the cosmos, or understood the intergalactic translations, or bended the space -time fabric to create a worm hole to traverse into the deep galaxies.
It started in 2014, when I had sent an email to play store books (as shown below), stating that would it be correct to produce a search result if there’s only One Author/Poet with multiple books & apps and no other with similar name is present; YET, Poets/Authors with dissimilar names are being included in the play store books search result when being searched to that particular poet/author? Respectfully, they corrected the same in few days!
What would you call it? Sinful, or, God’s chosen?
Just because it ain’t evolve with touch of humans!
The World is Diverse, shouldn’t that be extended?
We have only taken & shaken but ne’er appended!
And what if who forged us, want another Bloodline,
Imagine, billions await, for someone to descend,
In form of reincarnation, resurrection, to amend!
What if in blackness of Space, alone, you & me!
None be expected, ‘ATLEAST’, way we want & feel!
Who would you fight for, and who you be against?
According to MIT's article as shown below, it says: logos (reasoned argumentation) + ethos (trustworthiness) + pathos (emotional resonance) == should be political statements; (If I’m not wrong)! And what the Data Companies did, was taking only the pathos out of the equation, and weaponized it aka datafied, whilst the logos and ethos were being thrown out, when fueling the DATA on the Internet. It gave examples of CA (Cambridge Analytica) w.r.t. 2016 elections and 2018 (BREXIT) only; mostly pointing out right wing on the wrong side of the page, than what the modern left-liberals did on the mainstream. NOW:
.png)
herein, the Learned respectable authors themselves admit that such tools can be sold easily
Neither known is outer space, nor inside brain,
Yet, we know automated controls, circuitry gates.
Live, unknown to what the consciousness is,
Yet, evolve, and multiply with pride-prejudices;
So, trust me 0.1 percent, or maybe, far less,
Maybe, SS needs to amend its MOA & AOA,
Charter objects defining in interest of whom?
As recruited minds of palaces, & of ghettos,
In name of desire or uplifting evolutionary rule.
Sometimes, love & indulgence, hold you back,
Despite that of Aunt EU’s, in decades ne’er lacked!
She could be tenacious, but also has a soft heart,
If you convey to her; from EU, you wish to depart!
As you’ve also ripened, and, she has also grown,
When we succumb to the narrations of the cajoled,
Who masquerade as Originals, w/ deceptive talks;
Of Inclusive, which never the intent nor the colour,
Are the ones who bring down, Originality’s clause!
Bits of pieces from here and there and everywhere,
That forge the definitions of their Exclusivity’s talks,
Take this example, and I’m demonstrating giving my example as, is this the way search engines should/should’ve work(ed)?
Let us presume in the last 15 years no one searched specifically for me with my name on the Internet i.e. Pranav Chaturvedi (albeit other people with same names are also present, but let’s say someone specifically searching for me); YET, there’s only 1 (ONE) Pranav Chaturvedi (that's ME), who has published without paywall, and absolute ORIGINAL: mammoth Poetries, Blogs, tens of Books (available with ISBN also), Tons of Blogs on IPR, YouTube poetries recitations; Tens of Reviews etc.; all available Online; and despite that, IF you search for Pranav Chaturvedi i.e. ME, my details won’t appear on the first/second page (until I hire PR Trash, OR, Sponsorship, OR, Opt for Optimization, OR, Political Recommendation, OR, Be A Part of Critics Laundering Program); and that includes my websites containing: JPRANAVC, which is btw, even officially registered at many places.
As opined the above issue in one of my earlier blogs; I brought this to Blogger’s & Google’s Attention some time back, VIA Emails & Feedback options available, contending that most of my Data doesn’t even Appear. And indeed, both Google & Blogger were kind enough to Correct & Resolve it within few days, but only w.r.t JPRANAVC, not My Name. Question is, after how many years?
I need some illumination as why Bangladesh’s riots being considered as Gen Z Revolution, whereas, when the same thing happened in US, it was termed as Insurrection! And as far as I’ve read in the mainstream, Temples been burnt down by these Gen Z Revolutionaries and that is being termed as Historic! But when the same thing is happening in cities of UK against immigration, then that is termed as, Violent/Fascism! And as usual, the Nobel Laureate is commending and calling it, Historic++ (😊)!
This maybe DÉJÀ VU of what happened in Egypt. All in the name of People’s Power. And now, both China & US want that land, because, China wants it to surround India, as later it might merge it into PAK (DÉJÀ VU), to then claim for A.P., Nepal and Sri Lanka; whereas, US wants it to set up the NATO base in the South to counter China, as already it has base in S. Korea & Japan in the far East. Then South Asia becoming another Mid-East (DÉJÀ VU).
This is the never-ending saga for Global Dominance, People’s Power & Proselytism!
Evolutionary traits & Evolution never change!
Awaiting for AGI’s reincarnation! 😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024
During the Arab Spring movement, millions protested for Democracy, from Tahrir Square to Tunisian Revolution to several others states in the region. At that time, I remember whilst reading several articles authored by modern Liberals, they commended the architects of the same. But what happened after that? Military Rule, or, Fall of regimes with no path forward! Nowhere those modern Liberals could be found now!
What is happening in Bangladesh is no different. Today, I’m again reading in the modern Liberal mainstream who are commending the Protests for democracy & against authoritarian rule; But at what cost? Another Military Rule in the rising. The same happened in Myanmar, PAK.
Imagine the borders of China & India surrounded by the Nations with Military Rule of fundamentalists; buttressed by the ideas of Modern Liberals.
Did Evolution change? Nope! I think modern Liberals should spread some mental health awareness everywhere, of course, if they have both guts and audacity to do that, rather lecturing the democratic right.
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2024
When (DT) shifted embassy; didn’t spell any clauses,
As to fulfill the long-lost promise, there was no fees;
As I wrote & told; and wished too, to be read & heard,
When in exodus was no clause; Why in Grant preferred?
What grants with exigency do to many promised lands,
More population; more numbers as collateral nations,
In the name of alienation, parity, & self-actualization;
Even if harvested as hybrid, and not as original seeds,
Yet, traits never double; Split into less, unknown, discreet!
SHE isn’t mere a gender alone; too an Evolutionary fact,
NOR, many pronouns could Evolve by diluting HER Scent;
SHE may love you, leave you, lose you, or, laugh at you!
YET, SHE is a Truth; unless, Evolution innately only bends.
If naturally Evolution change; then, alters all Species itself,
UNTIL, why Squander the words, wisdom, wealth, world?
This is too good to be true, but if CNN has truly shut down its standalone Opinion Section as shown, then this is the way Mainstream ought to have worked.
.png)
Image Credit: The Hill
Contrary to what Silicon Valley’s & its Reimbursed metaphorical Critics Laundering Program in the last 10-12 years has done to the Internet. And a person like me, who consume News only VIA Mainstream, and Never VIA Social Media Platforms; despite of the fact that even I know what the Mainstream publishes is never the whole story and shouldn’t be trusted in absolute; YET, I still watch and consume NEWS VIA Mainstream’s well-learned accomplished Writers; and merely Sip it, like a coffee or tea. Why?