Both Harvard President Claudine Gay, & Mr. (Ackman/Musk)++, technically issued disagreeable statements. How? And with what DEI should be replaced with then? But before that, please understand four facts:
- - Firstly, right of one nation can differ from right of another nation! Thus, defining global left-liberal or right under one universal definition is incorrect. And it isn’t that only right is territorial. I can give examples in the world that at state level politics who pretend to be leftists-liberals/atheists, yet for vernacular territory, they took/can cross any steps!
- - Secondly, not only the global liberal-left, but the right too was/is antisemitic, and I can quote several examples, again. Thus, saying it’s only the left-liberal issue, would be incorrect too.
- - Thirdly, whether one state or two state solution; won’t resolve any issue, as it’s NOT the issue of states, but, of evolutionary traits. Whilst one state solution would forge contrived diversity in which JAUH alike political policies would evolve & hence the quest of who can procreate the most, which would further escalate the discord; two state would forge prolonged lethal border conflicts between two nations for decades & centuries to come.
- - Fourthly, a saying that: your definition of terrorism isn’t mine, but my definition of terrorism should be yours, without even comprehending the evolutionary demographics in depth; was started by the global mainstream, especially by west indeed. Sorry!
Now, whilst Claudine in the name of modern liberalism/leftism/centrism allowed Temple of Learning like Harvard to become breeding ground of the sympathizers of terror; Mr. (Ackman/Musk)++ too, somehow sent a message vide earlier funding/now defunding policies that, Temple of Learnings cannot work without the money being proffered/thrown to/on original teachers & gurus. And that’s amongst the many problems Academia faced in the last several decades. From fellowship programs to subsequent placements, as if evolutionary traits were buried for good. It isn’t about merit or no merit; as, you can give training to the deserving ones also. And what would you do of a merit if evolutionary traits were/are only dispensable? Tai Lung had the merit, yet, Oogway chose Po, & there was a reason behind that. Alas, that never happened in academia, and became the global academic pandemic, wherein India/Bharat too never remained untouched of it, rather, was/is succumbed to it. Today, CNNi, WSJ etc. maybe writing about modern liberal-left-centrism gone out of control these days, but my apologies; aren’t they the ones too amongst many, who projected such cringe worthy diluted philosophies at first place?
Thus, the recipe was slowly cooking on the back burner for decades, due to many (including above) reasons; and the end inedible product prepared -> neither can be consumed, nor be thrown away. Enjoy the status-quo, for good! And yes, DEI should be replaced, with evolutionary traits! 😊
©
Pranav Chaturvedi 2023