Whilst leafing through different many, when I came across to The Telegraph’s headlines that read as, ‘Why liberals have ended up cheerleading for jihadism,’ honestly, that didn’t surprise me, as it perfectly suited even for today’s Academia as well, including the recent actions of the academic crowd, whether of Harvard or Columbia or Oxford or UPenn and so on; as for decade & a half, I’ve been writing that the support of terror in future won’t originate from some remote archaic village on the planet, but indeed, both from both PR & Academia across World (as these two produce, project & amplify narratives), whilst Academia falling into the wrong hands long time back only was the triggering point for the first wave, by dilution of evolutionary traits. In the second wave, participants would originate; and in the third, the conductors!
Whereas, for the nations calling for two or one state solutions anywhere, I’ve few questions! Would China accept three state solution with Taiwan & Tibet? Would Russia accept free Crimea NATO populated Ukraine solution? Would US accept entire Mid-West/Southern states solution of the people who denounce(d) politics of both East-West coast, especially on immigration in the last three decades? Would India accept any separate ‘istan’ solution? Would EU accept 27 unshackled states solution? Would OIC accept not being sectarian Islamic solution?
Please understand! There was/is/would always be genuine mismatch of evolutionary traits, and there’s no solution whatsoever for anything! Accept it! Albeit laws ought to have been unneeded for humans, yet, max you can tame something someone. But for how long? And with what intensity? And furthermore, how long one would keep going with this status-quo?
Think about it!
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2023