Understanding Philosophy
behind JAUH via Caste-Census & Does It Contradict Itself!
What exactly is JAUH (Jitni Abadi Utna Haq)? And what if the proponents of the same in India; suggest such similar propositions to be implemented in USA/UK/Islamic Nations/Christian Homelands/Communist lands today as well amidst Globalization? What would be the implications? All herein below:
So, the Liberal-Leftists
Politicians in India suggesting caste-census, meaning, the representation
be made in the democracy in accordance with the size of the population covered!
Thus, let’s say, the caste-census helps in raising the reservation from
50% quota to 80% quota in jobs & academia in India, or in their
words, for wealth distribution, then under these circumstances, my theory of assemblage
of regionalism with common minimum agenda is a political myth & fallacy -> would
come into effect, as explained in my several previous blogs. How?
Firstly, whichever
respectable contending for JAUH in India also stood/stand in favour of the
movements alike Black Lives Matter, & compared the atrocities on
them, with some communities in India. Fine! But herein, JAUH theory coined by Liberal
Indian Politicians doesn’t add up several things! Because IF it’s
all about the population size (and forget once about origination, invention,
innovation, creation), then the Whites (including Christians) in USA,
EU, are correct by raising voices against -> Brown, Immigrants; as they’re still the largest population size therein, hence should
represent their own country more than anyone else! Further,
the Muslims in Mid-East+ are also correct in raising voices against other Races
& Ethnicities, and furthermore they embracing jihad against others is technically
too justified, as they should also represent their lands more than anyone
else in accordance with their population size! Even Pakistan is correct in
demanding the nation to maintain status-quo! And every regional state in
India is correct too in their own state level nationalism battle,
be it any. And let’s say, if the Indian Liberal Politicians request such philosophies
to be implemented in the US/UK/Islamic Nations/Christian Homelands/Communists
lands today, then it of course would be refused & disavowed by the
latter outrightly, as that might go against their own constitutions! Meaning, my
theory of the assemblage of the regionalism with common minimum agenda
is a political myth at the national & especially at global level
-> would be proven correct! Thus, seems, it’s the likes of the
Liberal Politicians, who’re in fact helping to End the indispensable Globalization!
As I’m writing about Liberals, I won’t dive into the Right-Wing
debate in this blog. Thence, aren’t Liberals going against their own values
by using such terms? Or should such terms even be considered as Liberal?
I’m a proponent of evolutionary
traits! Unlike Politicians! Doesn’t matter what your race or ethnicity
or caste or background is; what matters in life is the evolutionary
traits in any perceivable evolutionary cycle. No more, No less!
With such philosophies
in mind, the World as we know it today, might eventually come to an end! As,
once authentic globalism ends via concocted liberalism, so will nationalism, regionalism,
& so as politics everywhere!
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2023