A U.S. based draft report I leafed through (of course which is available online) articulated the perspectives of China on racism, international dominance; with China considering multiculturism as sickness & a component for a U.S. decline. Is this true? And can the said multicultural is sickness argument be also applied for other Democratic nations as well as for their decline? Does multiculturalism bring plight to territories? Is this the reason why unicultural nations alike Qatar & China (project as unicultural) Prosper? Let’s dissect it.
There're several interpretations of any single incident in modern history, thus making it unreliable, unless we dwell in multi-universe; hence won't be referring it herein.
Now, China despises multiculturalism, can be proven by going through the list of its present day alliance where it prefers more unicultural partners alike Pakistan than other Democratic Nations. But again, there’s a glitch. Why it’s not then in cohesion with other unicultural nations alike Japan? Is it because more than Uni or Multi, the ‘style of governance’ matters, and thus China is more inclined & prefers former’s way of governance than of latter? Before anything else, five questions need to be understood:
Q.1.
The inclination of western capitalists towards communism! Is there no
difference between modern capitalism & crony capitalism?;
Q.2.
The inclination of communism towards religious islamic nations or vice versa!
Is there no difference between nihilism & monotheism?;
Q.3.
If communism itself is unicultural, then is it monotheism or nihilism or atheism?;
Q.4.
The atheists’ views on Q.3 & what are atheists themselves then? Merely science
or rationality believers? If yes, then there’re many spiritual entities who’re
more inclined towards science than even atheists would be? Then who they’re? Neo-atheists?;
AND
Q.5.
The western mainstream & amnesty doctrines!
Yes, there’re
problems in Multiculturalism. One major thing is -> Incompatibility! Polygamy,
Proselytizing, Definition of God, Rituals, Food Habits, Rationality etc.
BUT, I give a very good example!
In one of my previous blog, I elucidated with examples why Science > Tech. As, Science is the foundation of Inventions whereas Tech is the foundation of Innovation & whereas Inventions > Innovations. The Science didn’t originate in last half a century. Its roots go back to several millennia. Concept of wheel, gravity, surgery, particle within particle, structure of planets, reference of time dilation, evolution etc. could be found in ancient texts. So, the correct interpretation of Science led us on the path of correct Inventions/Discoveries/Tech. This happened due to multiculturalism, critical understanding, authentic liberalism & Not uniculturalism.
Whereas, the decline of Democratic Nations occurred Not due to multiculturalism, BUT via planted trojan horses in Democracies, modern left liberals, concocted globalism, amnesty alike institutions, compromised mainstream, contrived ruckus, no uniform civil code!
What matters is the style of governance, evolutionary traits, trustworthiness, mindset, understanding of cosmos, why & what culture distort the equilibrium & how that can be circumvented via teachings.
Alas, If you would flow with cost-benefit ratio, you would acquire only materials not mindfulness! 😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2022