One cannot muddle with STEM for the reason that it’s result oriented based. So no matter how much I try to alter any theory as per my requirement or belief, IF, the result of it’s not in accordance with current acceptable definitions of STEM, it would be rejected in entirety or at least partially. Of course, I’m not equating the result or definitions in verbatim. There may be Science in something but never the process or tech involved. Or maybe later from which the process or tech itself is derived; again, all of which are part of STEM.
So our modern left liberal illiberal friends found another way to win The Prestigious Awards on International platform. The Domains they started participating in:
1. Climate (blah blah blah)
2. Economics (poverty porn, furthermore, which are probable on paper copyrightable fantasies)
3. Peace (contrived assertions)
4. Literature (diversity)
An award shalt unquestionably be for anything unparalleled. But we’ve reduced it to merely based on representation. I’m not saying recipients of any authentic award shalt start acting snobbish or become literally in verbatim, a merchant alike, just because of recipients’ unparalleled work, as no work is an individual’s achievement but an accumulation of thoughts & actions -> learnt perceived experienced acknowledged, time down the line. But, recipients of any award must only be for any unparalleled work. No PR. No playing forever victim card. No contrived unwarranted diversity. No Billionaire funding. No left right centre. Just unparalleled. As that only shalt become the substrata for another groundbreaking work to thrive. BTW, Merchants ain’t Philosophers.
Alas! Except in STEM, even Nobel is reduced to mere modern left liberal politics.
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2021