Sunday, January 31, 2021

Via DATA, The Human Progress ERR Devolution!

 

The term Human Progress via DATA is Misdirection! Firstly, if you believe in DATA, then accept of being stringent supporter of foundations built on cost-benefit ratio, practicality & pragmatism. So, I feel amused when LEFT cite DATA SCIENCE about Human Progress BUT at the same time, calls for building foundations of Sharing Caring, Open Borders to Everything else! JOKE!

Alike you run your own budget efficient/deficit house, any Nation too progresses, accordingly, if & when DATA is your concern! Like noted Physicist Lee Smolin wrote that the progress in Physics stopped in 80s (compared to past) & beyond, due to not thinking the way Physicists afore use to, & further rather relying on the present measures in herd (citing example of String Theory) (I’ve not worded in verbatim, of course). Similarly, the Human Progress, if we measure via DATA, then it’s a dead end, because it isn’t Human Progress, it’s in actuality indication of, HUMAN DEVOLUTION. For Example: You can’t via DATA quote terms of Human Progress, that one who was receiving One time meal once, now receive Two times. Absurd! Humans shouldn’t have been stooped to this Low, reaching to this situation for Decades or Centuries, that now DATA calculates the times of meals they intake, to reflect Human Progress; OR to evaluate less wars or species of animals getting extinct or the increased age of humans or number of people educated (not using the term schooling as I despise it) on yoy basis, & the list goes on. This isn’t measuring Human Progress! This is Embarrassment! Our fate to reach to such situation is an indication or premonition of near about to collapse entire civilization, maybe as species. For Example, if someone few decades from now cites: DATA analysis shows that the intake capacity of Oxygen supplied to All, has been increased from this level to that; would it be considered as a measure or sign of Human Progress? NAH NAH NAH!

DATA Science is basically a statistical model. Please note that I’m only pointing out the concerns when such models are used to reflect supra issues statistically, in the name of Human Progress; which is honestly similar to, when loathed in Muck, you’re discussing the ecstatic pleasurable orgasmic scent of Hugo Boss, statistically! 😊

© Pranav Chaturvedi 2021