If xRy, then yRx under Symmetry
in a certain Set.
Merely using
this as an analogy or metaphor or to elucidate the context of one recent research
conducted which attached strings of two distinct aspects of traits into one by
relating Virtuous to a Narcissist/Fascist. So, I conduce w.r.t. that analogy:
If
Virtuous -> Narcissist || Fascist, then Fascist || Narcissist ->
Virtuous.
Why screech then, if used either, as per symmetry?
And so goes with Virtuous
Victim Signaling. As in accordance with the study, I interpret that a proud
fascist, neo whatever, can be a ‘virtuous’ victim too who could be a believer
of everything upgraded, like others, & as being virtuous, can have no ill
trait. Am I justified?
Researches as itself ‘may
not’ be wrong. Its Interpretations & Interpreters are, or maybe who inducted
it. Just as how some interpret statutes or laws or future technologies (eg. flying cars vs. tunnels) or
ideological perspectives or economies. But if there’re no interpretations, then
of course, there’re no debates nor suits, as everything is defined in books
with definitions. No Appeals. No Conflicts. No Counter Contentions. Read all in
verbatim, word by word, line by line & page by page &, Resolved! So why
not correctly interpret any research or for the sake of a good fabric, not even
start such irrelevant researches.
Travesty
is, there’re researches being conducted on behalf of Funders for their want of
others to interpret things in accordance with their ‘own’ belief or to cover
their own footprints from past. But do such researches even make sense except
being published & peer reviewed or some management institute including in
their syllabus for training? For how long one would exploit the inferiority
complexes of the people across globe knowing such existence is in abundance! Is
that even ethical? And would that even serve any purpose eventually?
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2020