Firstly,
whoever laid the foundation of ‘cancel culture’ everywhere must never be
defended ‘anywhere’ when they themselves
suffer its impact!
Secondly, the Poor/Rich debate is old & several partisan arguments - counter arguments can be put & published. Material of that too is available in libraries (online/within walls). But all are almost similar. Selfsame ideologies involved with similar outlandish uninteresting concepts & definitions from universal basic income to taxing rich to free everything to share in the production & profit to state hold to private hold to PPP to ruckus & riots to demands to unions to revolution to let them eat cakes to 1% to silent voices to control over economies to manipulated markets to few funders to world police to loan waivers & it goes on & on & on.
Travesty
is, this all originate(d) from some of the world’s top Academia (who themselves remained static, outlandish
& repetitive). And this repetition never ameliorated anything. But when
their existence is challenged, they backlash with detestable doctrines,
planting & funding it.
This
is what happens when merchants are allowed to run Academia or end up imparting
knowledge.
Poor/Rich
debate doesn’t matter till certain point &
yes, there comes a time when it’s to be debated & what should be made precisely
available. This is just another distinct writing amongst millions selfsame
already existing materials w.r.t. Poor-Rich debate.
There’re
definitions for Poor defined already and
so as for Rich. Till certain point, this won’t matter BUT at the threshold, it
would. And I’m not including those moronic nonsensical examples given by MSM of
some poor farmer kid who made into a Top Institute & built career. If that’s
your story & solution, why not ask the remaining poor farmers’ kids to do
the same. Funding is available to them by Government & respective Institutes. And did that farmer's kid actually sacrifice schooling or career? So, this perspective of defining Education, Career & coming out of poverty, by
MSM is absolutely Nonsensical. And don’t show the graphs as already counter
graphs are available. I’m not a Data Denier but also not believer in Copy Pasting.
1. Detach:
Poor
or Rich, doesn’t matter but if you’re in the school or college or otherwise, &
end up attaching yourself too much in the domestic/family affairs that if one
day, a situation is arisen, who’s going to be sacrificed, you end up becoming
the first contender via overwhelming emotions. This could happen with both Poor
& Rich. So in the career period, one should be least attached to the
domestic/family affairs. This would give you credence of a better successful
career. After that, you could do whatever you wanted to do for your family.
Remember: Most
of the successful People you see in the Market didn’t sacrifice anything for
their Families WHEN they were in School or Colleges or Otherwise (Whether they were earlier Poor or Rich).
2. Make
Funding Available at the Right Time:
Let
not ask for guarantors or mortgages for student loans to certain amount. Increase
scholarships & ask Students to help provide funds to the Institutes in return
once completion & when commence working.
3. Most
courses can be done online:
Most
of the major courses can be done online like µPs & µCs / EC / CSE / CS / BA
/ FA / MFA / IT / Mgmt etc. Make it available to all & raise Collective IQ + Collective EQ rather than dealing
with few Strictly Schooled IQs,
which in any case have only helped in deterioration of the World. Not
unschooled but the Strictly Schooled ruined the World. So cut down cost of
Internet & some Electronic Devices which could be recycled.
4. Educate
Not School:
Education!
Not merely Schooling. Evaluate at individual level. Subject specific interests
& admissions. Individual level research & funding & global acceptance.
Yup! This is also true that day to day life issues consume entire life & one may not even get time for anything else. But if till ‘initial phase’ of life, the above four points could be followed or implemented strictly, accepted strictly, & being recognized strictly, then there would never be debate of Poor/Rich BUT only of who Innovated/Contributed what for Society. Let’s Analyze!
BUT some fear of this, hence let FUD + Inferiority Complexes prevail! 😊
© Pranav Chaturvedi 2020