A defect in provision or law cannot be used to ascertain any fact or adhere to standards unless the defect in itself is first rectified or amended. One cannot circumvent the mere fact that interpretation matters & further, course of natural justice & interpretation of provisions would always collide, wherever genuinely needed. But where we have to circumvent depends on the situation involved & recipients. Hence, I would always contend for cognizance of perceptible evolutionary traits. And if not been taken, the interpretations done would dilute the whole meaning of circumventing which would only mean defect in conclusions.
Not
worth writing in terms of 'shall' or 'mandatory' or 'procedural' (unless 'ought
to' in normal due course of action) BUT 'directory' or 'expansive
interpretation' or otherwise, where defects in any provision itself shouldn't
undermine any necessitated outcome. The necessitated outcome could be contaminated,
indeed covered are the hands with mud. But let that dirt be used to plant a
seed, not to paint image with muck. Let that mud be used to build a shelter &
not to put a spot on someone else’s.
The
institutional progress doesn’t depend on expansion of any institution. Institutional
progress depends on recipients & further expansive outreach. Utter nonsense
in stating modern world was created from the ashes of tyranny or fascism.
Detestable doctrines planted are mere exemplars where such modern scope got
doped with shaky crust.
Thence,
the muck smeared on fabric (thanks to unauthentic all) needs to be uncontaminated
which could only be done by expanding the scope of interpretation, & simultaneously
knowing where it needs to be expanded & where it needs to be narrowed down
or simply overlooked.
Alas!
If Bookish, Adherents of Verbatim, Messiah of Inferiority Complexes are the new
normal. 😊