Irrespective
of any affiliation to MSM or not or amount of coverage, whatsoever (categorically stating deterioration of quality
of main stream in the last couple of decades is not a myth), idea of cancel
culture is appalling. But again emerges its two variants:
· Territorial
· Global
Scheduled
presentations, if not based on
funded shrieks or mistaken facts, then irrespective of being contentious, this whole
idea of cancelling is detestable, irrespective of the audience. I restrict
firstly this to Territorial. And if cancelled under pre-meditation or external
funding or strategic planning or undue influence, this could be attributed our
steps towards reverse evolution. Not advising to be thick skinned as thick
skinned are shameless too. But one should’ve potential to hear contentions
credible of being heard. Might not know, something’s unlocked that ‘updates’
you. Indeed, we’ve an environment created where it’s easy for pusillanimous funded
to bamboozle guileless who sucked inferiority complexes since inception &
have no standing, & thus for such, counter presentations are indispensable.
Further, for those minds stuck in fulfilling living day to day lives, then from
360 degree angle, notions are needed to illumine them too.
Regarding Global, wherein from genuine security concerns to unwarranted interventions occur & further wherein the narrator is merely a funded projector or an absolute partisan puppet or otherwise narrating with an intent to influence to deceive by partly or intentionally negating the whole facts involved whilst narrating, which could send incomplete to redacted information or misinformation to its recipients or eventually end up creating ruckus to discord within any region, then of course, this term stands ‘irrelevant’ & decisions w.r.t. that can be evaluated accordingly.
So,
the term cancel culture is more restricted to Territorial (existence of which is appalling) than Global!