Albeit
I Immensely Respect Teachers & Academicians & Why Not! I myself come
from a Family of those who witnessed Several Generations of Teachers/Academicians/Writers
( Well I'm Not :( ), BUT When Academicians Support + Participate
+ Incite Ruckus on Streets OR Otherwise; A Detestable message is Amplified that
doesn't suit on Their Persona. They are supposed to Carve NOT Crave or Harm!
What
exactly 'Foreign Interference' Suppose
to Mean in past, disregard it. How it's equated or defined, Today, as in Today, let's discuss.
Take
a case study or presume it exists, one which is Projected 24x7 kindred to, Foreign Interference through Political
Opinions + Ads (Wherein Expenditure is Utterly Trivial [Note]) in any Electoral in
Support of Certain Individual in which
Substrata of it Rested, narrowed down to 'only' one Social Media Platform
Wherein it's called a Result of Political Interference when that succeeded?
So
accordingly, in conjunction with herein supra predetermined context, Political
Interference could also be Stated as (Fictional
Definition): "Funding of Entities
in Someone Else's Land to Create Ruckus Discord - Purposely, Intentionally,
Unnecessarily! Albeit even if an Opinionator/Contributor/Columnist governed by designated
Clauses, indemnify Publishers for Content OR Conduct, Similar to Ads; Still Any
Opinion made Against OR in Favour of Any Nation / Individual, Originating from
Anywhere OR from Any Media House in the World would also Amount to 'Foreign
Interference' Wherein 'Interconnected Globalized World' shalt be omitted to
absolve anyone, including Publishing Platform & further would be Governed
by Law of the Land Against / in Favour of whom
the Opinion was Projected!"
This
transmutes the Definition Completely wherein now even an Opinion would amount
to Political interference as it could be contended that Opinion tried to
influence guileless Minds especially if the Land is Poor or Developing. IF such
definition is ever Floated in a Globalized World, then everyone would have ammo
to Invoke Political Interference of Past or Present Interferences on Anyone EVEN
if an Opinion or Column was/is written.
Political
Interference should be corroborated with:
- No. of MSMs Owned by Who want to Interfere;
- Total Amount Spent;
- Head Counts, Assets Planted (Generational
or Not);
- Reach;
-
Does on every Occasion, Discordance in Fabric OR Ruckus on Streets are Perceptible?
If
True or Proven, then this would Indeed
amount to as Political Interference.
We
live in a Globalized World. All are Interconnected. There would be Likes &
Dislikes in terms of Tastes & what & who we want to see even on the
Other Side, on the Political Spectrum. Restricted to case study mentioned
herein supra in para 3 may to
certain extent Not Amount to
Political Interference BUT to para
6, ABSOLUTELY!
P.S. ->
I mostly
avoid in my Writing taking names & restrict it to keep it General ELSE If not
done, Nothing Original Would be left in the Content, ending up being Selfsame
Unoriginal Partisan Based Content Notions Already Existing.