This World is not Conclusion,
A Species stands beyond;
Invisible, as Music,
But positive, as Sound.
- Emily Dickinson
STILL
Like convention countries. Though United by
Treaties but governed by own law of the land. One can't compete Elections
merely by speaking, "I represent the World or Universe and thus I now
choose to Fight Elections from this Specific Country," UNLESS the
Contender 'itself' is an Alien or God having Intergalactic Free Access and not
governed by any regional law of the land.
A Purest
Form of Non - Conformist. :)
One has to be a Nationalist or at least emanate
some extent of Nationalism while being a Contender in any country's specific
elections, further that shouldn't be reflected merely with decoration. And
that's not devolution as some contended, fighting like Chimps for territories.
Nope!
Indeed, the presence on the chair should also be in
cohesion with the International Affairs as whether the Contender would be able
to amalgamate or stand or upgrade the land against all
odds. But one can't contend in a country's specific elections on behalf of
everyone else except that country's inhabitants. At least that Time has
still not yet come.
Nationalism is Not purely associated with the
Right. The Reason is if one is proud of something then one won't be ashamed of
it unless either Doctrine of Assuage or Complexes enwreathe someone. For
instance, if Merely to Assuage, 'ANCIENT' Ameliorated Ancestors ( Who
Actually Always Contended to Embrace The Way Forward + SCIENCE & further
even demonstrated it ) are being Demeaned, then somehow that
projection is selfsame to what is stated herein supra in this para and thus
instill doubts about the candidature.
My Quote:
"'Globalism'
isn't Bad, but seems Kind of Identities Projected were either being Denounced
or Disliked;
Resulting,
even what ought to be considered Indispensible, still WORLD Reverberated -
Change The Sight."
No one should EVER question or doubt the
Contributions made by Globalism. But it would be wrong to never
discern the incongruity, if it exists or concerns are / were raised. An Individual's life cycle or lineage would be absolutely different from someone else's life cycle or lineage. And thus, incongruity
would undeniably exist. But That doesn't mean
understanding could not be reached or should not be reached. But denying existence
of incongruity would be intentional & unreasonable.
Thus, I conclude by once again quoting Emily
Dickinson-
Who win, and nations do not see,
Who fall - and none observe;
Whose dying eyes, no Country,
Regards with patriot love.
:)
© Pranav
Chaturvedi 2019