We follow this general
conception of putting the onus on only few nations/people/clan to practice the
concept of Diversity. But we never acknowledge this fact as why others have out
rightly failed to implement the same principle in their own culture or land or
organization. And if that’s the priority or of utter importance,
shouldn’t that be a global order in general that should be followed? Right?
Whether Gender or
Ethnic, Clan or Creed, if this concept is supposed to inculcate distinct ideas
from diversified people from different backgrounds & experiences which
furthermore transmutes the prospects of any organization or nation or people,
then it is indeed an indispensable concept. Right? But then another question
ensues! In an era of globalization, why we question the integrity of only few on the said concept? What about others who too are well heeled
by the grace of nature & mother earth? I hope you all understood whom I am referring to.
Not a myth that this
noble concept certainly helps in modernization & refines the putrid values
too. Or else, would be selfsame to living in a stagnant pond with an inherited
belief gone rotten, with this inception that the whole universe exists inside
this pond. Moreover, where distinct healthy opinions are not debated, those
nations or societies undoubtedly never prosper. But then isn’t it
inappropriate, questioning or pointing the conduct of those who are at least
practicing this ideology by giving it a larger scope? And if this principle is
unviable, then no point debating further. Right?
Ok! What about who do
succeed in becoming the part of any organization/nation, as the direct
recipient of this principle. Do they follow the same conduct in their
individual life? And when separated, do they imbibe & practice this theory
by not only supporting their own clan or region but also giving individuals an
equal opportunity of distinct clans or regions, who too are in need? Or do they
overlook this concept by doing more for their own clan or cult or nation rather
doing it for others with this mere intention to establish a status in their own
nation or community or whatever? No idea! But this should also be taken into
account. And do they preach the same concept in their own land or organization
too? Also there exists a snag as who should reflect such issues. Projectors? :)
I am a feminist. INDEED!
But there are some who take the advantage of the supra theory, to fulfill their
own objectives. My apologies! But I have myself witnessed Exceedingly Qualified
women & their conduct, as turning savage, against an innocent woman
colleague. Appalling! Vile! And I failed to discern the reason, Why? And that’s not the end. There are plenty of
selfsame instances available. Furthermore, their target is always weak women
who either don’t have any backup or support. So the whole concept of gender
diversity shouldn’t be discerned in verbatim. Those who truly deserve should
also be the recipient. Never Mind!
Thence, this should be a
collective effort. Don’t be judgmental or condemn a particular section of the
society or land for not following this principle at large. Admittedly, there is
a moral obligation to reach out & assist those who are in need. But others
too cannot escape from this responsibility for not including distinct
ideologies in their own land or organization, if there exists some
expectations. Remember: No land provides 100% robust value or cultural system
& no ideology is 100% refined. It is something what is good, is good,
irrespective of how much profit or loss it makes :)
Copyright © Pranav Chaturvedi 2015