What
it means to be a True Being, I don’t know. The scientific evolution theory, the
mysteries of the big bang to parallel universe, undeniably, are true. As it is
based on facts and logics. But after all, they all are just Theories. No one has
gone back billions of years or have seen what the Fish exactly happened, before
Big Bang or after it. May be our belief in the existence of that someone or
many, somewhere, up there, might also be true. The only difference is one wants to find the answers through logic and the latter through belief.
I am a
guy who believes in reasoning, logic & distinct facts. But
I am Not an Atheist. There is something where my mind also keeps wishing for the
existence of that or any unknown cosmic power :)
So,
could we conclude people who believe in divinity are more at peace with
profound thoughts as always contended? Many people I have come across (Well Distinct Experiences) who purely believe in
the facts of evolution theories & other selfsame insights, somehow, some of
them I have found to be contented, but yeah, they all are utterly dry & insensitive. Dry coz they don't believe in souls.
Insensitive coz they don't believe in heaven & hell. And those who believe
in something or in that someone or many, somewhere, up there, many of them seems
to be discontented, with fake sensitivity but subsisting with some
emotions. Fake sensitivity coz they feel that someone up there forgives everyone
if they pray. And emotions coz they believe in souls. But for sure, nothing exists in Absolute. The contentment part
can be switched.
As
contended by a physicist, those events which are rare, we surmise them as miracles,
which is actually veracious. Furthermore, it seems preposterous but still
logical to have this thought that whether divine beings were or are extraterrestrials
that visited Terra once and might visit again! We might discover parallel universe,
would be able to make exotic matters & worm holes and might take a trip to
see what exists in this universe in the distant future, but how the hypothesis about
'why' and 'for what', would be concluded, I don't know, which in actuality is the utmost knowledge & wisdom one can achieve.
What exactly
is being contended here is instead of subsisting with fear about something , one should try to evolve good conscience in their mind, which in true sense proffer peace.
Ok! It's been said that one shouldn't keep animus towards anyone. Leave it on Karma. That gives quietude. But What exactly is the life cycle of Karma? It’s a profound terminology. But
exactly how long one should wait or leave on Karma? The answer might be not
available. But still it’s an utterly profound option to follow. Or
else what, avenge? Nope. Wrong desire.
Am
just comparing only the two sides. The tertiary or any other belief is not encompassed.
So
who is at more peace? A being who sheds belief in divinity, emotions and engulf
his/her mind with reasoning or logics? Who think his remains would be
contributed to flora & fauna? Someone who thinks any kind of attachment is
a mere poundage? Or someone who believes in that someone or many, up there, somewhere,
who's looking at the deeds beneath deciding the fate, so if you do good, would
be loved; do bad, would also be loved but only if you pray;which furthermore inculcate one to have emotions? Or Peace is just a
state of mind, a calculated measure which deploys and activates a firewall whenever
required which detaches you from all connectivity. Confounding!
Copyright © Pranav Chaturvedi 2015