Sometimes! ERR! Always
Adapting the Methodologies without any hunch or query Not with Respect to the
any Technical Part, obviously unless an Alternate Theory is subsisting or
Defined, but those implemented towards the Social System, is a Tradition. But
Narrowing down to the Social Perspective, where now, the Definition of Decency
is more or Less debased. One doesn't
have to meticulously go through the tedious Technical Analysis or Study of Data
while making any inference towards, where one can conduce to some conclusion.
But if Decency is Defined as
the Requirements of Accepted or Respectable Behaviour or the Behaviour that
conforms to accepted standards of morality or respectability, who would conform
the more accurate predefined Accepted Respectable Behaviour? Why? Because if
the accepted behaviour which presumably concocted with the Refined Education
Imparted to the Decision Makers at any Level would have been refined, than such
Social Chaos anywhere wouldn't have been Existed. Would it be Decent to be good
in playing Politicking Hunger Games by remaining Numb? Would it be Decent to
Learn Not to be Emotional? Would it be Decency to Learn or Teach to make Enthusiasts learning's diluted for their own purpose? Would it be Decent not to Accept your Fault
which preposterously been Taught everywhere?
And such demeanors are Accepted by the Enthusiasts. With no conformity
of Wrong or Right, and Neither of Those wanting to Resurrect the Enthusiasts
propositions because of the insecurity about losing their own position. But
Without Reacting, Abusing and Using well versed language, Pleasing: would it be
Decency?
The Developing Phase
concentrate to project an entity with an Attitude with a Good Approach Learnt
but which might not be an Implied Decency. How would a Person conclude that the
Appearance has avoided impropriety or immodesty? How? How would those Fake
Manners or demeanor be differentiated from Decency in verbatim? Could the
Decency be Goodness towards the Good and the Bad too OR Goodness only towards
the Good? Here Goodness is adapted in verbatim with no Motive or Opportunism
diluted with it.
An Emotional Angry Homosapein
could be Decent; Also an Unemotional Bloke with good refined presentable
attitude with no tinge of anger but only a smile, might not be Decent.
Like Decency Doesn't generate
while kindred to any Dynasty or Fraternity or to any Household or Profession,
the same cannot be acquired on the Basis of Selection. Which to me also is
paradoxical. Still would be Learning. But equating Standard with Decency would
be Wrong and Concocted Learning.
Copyright © Pranav Chaturvedi 2014