The Notion of Being Decent!!

Sometimes! ERR! Always Adapting the Methodologies without any hunch or query Not with Respect to the any Technical Part, obviously unless an Alternate Theory is subsisting or Defined, but those implemented towards the Social System, is a Tradition. But Narrowing down to the Social Perspective, where now, the Definition of Decency is more or Less debased.  One doesn't have to meticulously go through the tedious Technical Analysis or Study of Data while making any inference towards, where one can conduce to some conclusion.

But if Decency is Defined as the Requirements of Accepted or Respectable Behaviour or the Behaviour that conforms to accepted standards of morality or respectability, who would conform the more accurate predefined Accepted Respectable Behaviour? Why? Because if the accepted behaviour which presumably concocted with the Refined Education Imparted to the Decision Makers at any Level would have been refined, than such Social Chaos anywhere wouldn't have been Existed. Would it be Decent to be good in playing Politicking Hunger Games by remaining Numb? Would it be Decent to Learn Not to be Emotional? Would it be Decency to Learn or Teach to make Enthusiasts learning's diluted for their own purpose? Would it be Decent not to Accept your Fault which preposterously been Taught everywhere?  And such demeanors are Accepted by the Enthusiasts. With no conformity of Wrong or Right, and Neither of Those wanting to Resurrect the Enthusiasts propositions because of the insecurity about losing their own position. But Without Reacting, Abusing and Using well versed language, Pleasing: would it be Decency?

  

The Developing Phase concentrate to project an entity with an Attitude with a Good Approach Learnt but which might not be an Implied Decency. How would a Person conclude that the Appearance has avoided impropriety or immodesty? How? How would those Fake Manners or demeanor be differentiated from Decency in verbatim? Could the Decency be Goodness towards the Good and the Bad too OR Goodness only towards the Good? Here Goodness is adapted in verbatim with no Motive or Opportunism diluted with it.

An Emotional Angry Homosapein could be Decent; Also an Unemotional Bloke with good refined presentable attitude with no tinge of anger but only a smile, might not be Decent.

Like Decency Doesn't generate while kindred to any Dynasty or Fraternity or to any Household or Profession, the same cannot be acquired on the Basis of Selection. Which to me also is paradoxical. Still would be Learning. But equating Standard with Decency would be Wrong and Concocted Learning.

Copyright ©  Pranav Chaturvedi 2014

Values!

So, wouldn't it be preposterous to conduce in the acceptance of someone’s Values in a more superior approach by the existence of mere fact that the social judgment relied on the conception of singularity with no inferences made from divergent understandings and thoughts, narrowing to what are the essentials or basic things of great significance that needs to be fulfilled as requirements, especially leading to one important aspect: existence and projection of his/her representatives in the form of kindred descendants, Clan or other Menage in the Social Arena? So when, this individual bloke with his/her descendants or whoever kindred to same tree, complete the Holy Accomplishments, would be projected as the beholder of Superior Values even if his caring and giving’s are limited for his clan or tree only. But could this Theory be Justified? Or could this person if in Social Arena, projects himself as a caring bloke towards his/her lineage or household Members and give justifications, as he too being kindred to a Family, thus impliedly making this being the beholder of good Values. Would be right? Not Necessarily!!

But if you scrupulously observe, these blokes are being considered in the social arena subsisting with good values by mere following the herein supra guidelines.

It is an unwarranted truth that has been accepted so far but not so good. Precisely the truth might be is when we confuse ourselves and amalgamate ‘Responsibility’ and ‘Values’. A Bloke devoted and kindred towards his own clan fulfilling the adjudged social necessities are ‘Responsibilities’ not ‘Values’. But how far he has gone or one would stretch himself/herself, engulfing the wrongful or righteous demeanor to accomplish the adjudged necessities, that is when the seeds of Values are sown. And from the point when that demeanor was evolved while adopting theories to justify one’s standing and standard in the Social Arena to establish his/her persona, is where one should evaluate Values and not by mere succumbing to some adopted measures which are nothing but Responsibilities.

The crestfallen part is in the social arena, especially the projectors within the system, endorses the concept of former supra propositions or hypothesis as the barometer to adjudge one’s Values which is Not deplorable but sorrowful.  

Note: All my blogs are subjected to Copyrights