The conceptualization of
Mentorship is mutated. Would you call it Mentorship if you Mentor an A++
holder bloke. Would have to denounce this Subjective Theory of Mentoring.
If you perceive it
scrupulously, this subjective theory is accepted in abundance. But the
most distressed part comes when Teachers, Mentors and Preachers themselves become Discontented Beings thus becoming arduous as what
kind of knowledge, wisdom or guidance they would share with their followers or
disciples. No Doubt, the teachings would be as per the acceptance and expectations of the
social homosapiens, but it would always subsist with the spot of diluted sanctity.
The questions ensue: Does the
Mentor illuminate with the mojo box of knowledge to the Mentee for his own
desires? Does the Mentor understand the perspective of the Mentee as on which
road he wants to walk a mile or miles? Or Does the Mentor, himself being contented, but
wrongly Mentors an egocentric bloke, who later defies the edge and
the threshold of that knowledge for not to be used for any right conduct?
Still this is something
paradoxical to ascertain the concept of which one truly defines Mentoring.
But one thing is certain:
Mentorship is not Mentoring A++ Candidate. The Real Deal is to Mentor an F
Grade holder Mentee.
Note:
All my blogs are subjected to Copyrights