Innocent Women/Honesty Grievance Cell for Organizations!!!! Indispensable.

I will always contend to have a separate INDEPENDENT Women Grievance Cell for Innocent Women in every Organization, be it Public or Private.

The recent Woman IAS suspension fighting for probity worries me a lot.

How about those Women who Fight like her in Corporate or other Organizations?? Either they are Fired or Anguished.

My Contention is: Would any Organization take action against an employee, even after knowing the improper persona or conduct of that person, who brings  huge business to him. NOPE. I don’t know the stats coz I am not sure whether such stats even exists.

And why only concentrate on Women. Why can’t we have HONESTY Grievance Cell in every Organization!

Furthermore, why can’t we have Ethics and Moral Science Training Sessions in every Organization on weekends? That’s indispensable!!

Note: All my blogs are subjected to copyright.

Student-Institute Relationship---is it a Contract?

Well, this is confounding to me. Is any Education Institute's relationship with a Student a Contract? And what does that mean? For non payment of Fees, can an Education Institute ask any guileless student to leave the Institution in the midterm or mid session? What if only a year or two are left for completion?

Can it be perceived as a non payment of remuneration?

Furthermore, is an Education Institute-University relationship a Contract of Agency? Because an Institute provide degrees of some other University who can be perceived as principal.

Thence, can the Student-Institute relationship be comprehended as a Contract?

If Yes, would it be Fair?

And in such cases, what could be the role of the University?

And if it’s fair, it would be utterly unfair!

Note: All my Blogs herein are subjected to Copyright.

Retrospective Relief.

Recent SC decision quashing MCI to hold NEET Examination unfolds one more proposition according to my understanding.

It says MCI cannot conduct the NEET Examination but “its verdict will not affect the admissions which have already taken place”. And according to my cognition what does that mean? “A conduct of any Authority in the past, if it was not qualified to commit that, but if it had committed it, should not make the innocent and guileless people, who were the direct recipients of that conduct, get affected. And what does that mean? People can get relief retrospectively too.”

Well, I have not read the entire decision and my opinion purely depends on the news headlines I have perceived. So, validity of my opinion is on “AS IS” basis and is subjected to get changed.